PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS2-05-11: Early oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

View Full Paper
SLS. Lee

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to compare the oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (C-NSM).
  • Retrospective review of NSM patients with immediate breast reconstruction from 2019 to 2022.
  • Exclusion of risk-reducing cases and comparison after 1:5 propensity score matching.
  • Use of nearest-neighbor methods for matching with a caliper of 0.2.
  • No locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death in the R-NSM group.
  • C-NSM group had 3 locoregional recurrences (1.5%), 3 distant metastases (1.5%), and 7 total recurrences (3.5%).
  • Finding shows significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) for R-NSM (p = 0.002).

Abstract

Abstract Background: Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) was developed to minimize visible scarring and improve the quality of life in breast cancer patients. However, despite its increasing adoption, data on its oncologic outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of R-NSM and conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (C-NSM). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent NSM with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for breast cancer between 2019 and 2022. Risk-reducing cases were excluded. R-NSM and C-NSM groups were compared after 1:5 propensity score matching using nearest-neighbor methods (caliper = 0.2). Results: After 1:5 propensity score matching, most clinicopathologic variables were well balanced between groups. The median follow-up duration was 37.5 months for the R-NSM group and 42.6 months for the C-NSM group. No locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death occurred in the R-NSM group. All oncologic events occurred in the C-NSM group, including 3 locoregional recurrences (1.5%), 3 distant metastases (1.5%), and 7 total recurrences (3.5%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant differences in LRFS (p = 0.162), DMFS (p = 0.255), or DFS (p = 0.050), though all adverse events occurred in the C-NSM group. Event-based comparison revealed a significantly better DFS for R-NSM (p = 0.002). In multivariable Cox analysis, older age (HR = 0.14, p = 0.040) and positive nodal stage (N1: HR = 4.7; N3: HR = 31.9, p = 0.042) were associated with increased recurrence risk. R-NSM showed a lower recurrence hazard in univariable analysis (HR = 0.12, p = 0.177). Conclusion: R-NSM showed oncologic outcomes comparable to those of conventional NSM, with no recurrence or mortality observed despite longer follow-up. These results support R-NSM as a safe and effective surgical option for appropriately selected breast cancer patients. Citation Format: S. Lee. Early oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy: a propensity score matching analysis abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-05-11.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S. Lee (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efd9fhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-05-11
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper