PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Dentistry Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Gap Formation at Luting Interfaces of CAD/CAM Ceramic and Composite Partial Crowns Assessed by OCT

View Full Paper
NON OberückDPDennis PalsaTMTobias Meißner

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze gap formation at interfaces of CAD/CAM crowns made from two different materials after load testing.
  • Restored human mandibular molars with LS2 and RBC partial crowns using adhesive cementation.
  • Employed optical coherence tomography for imaging at various time points, including after thermomechanical loading.
  • Quantified gap lengths at specific interfaces and conducted statistical comparisons.
  • LS2 exhibited a larger gap length than RBC at the partial crown-luting interface.
  • The largest median gap length for LS2 was found at dentin, while for RBC it was at the enamel interface.
  • Both materials maintained stable adhesive performance without debonding under in vitro conditions.

Abstract

(1) Background/Objectives: Gap formation contributes to the clinical failure of partial crowns. Therefore, it was analyzed at the interfaces between restoration, luting material, and tooth in partial crowns made of lithium disilicate ceramic (LS2) and nanohybrid composite (RBC) after thermomechanical loading (TCML) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). (2) Materials and Methods: Sixteen human mandibular molars were restored with CAD/CAM partial crowns made of LS2 (IPS e.max® CAD) or RBC (Tetric® CAD) using adhesive cementation (Variolink® Esthetic DC). The restorations were imaged by OCT (1550 nm, 28 kHz) at t0 = 24 h, t1 = 90 days of water, t2 = after TCML with 480,000 loading cycles, and t3 = TCML with 1,200,000 loading cycles. Gap lengths (%) at interface 1 (partial crown-luting material) and interface 2 (luting material–enamel/dentin) were quantified. Groupwise and pairwise comparison of OCT parameters was conducted using the Mann–Whitney U, Friedman, and Conover–Iman tests with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). (3) Results: At interface 1, LS2 showed a larger median gap length than RBC (ceramic = 48.4%; composite = 5.2%, p < 0.01). At interface 2, the largest median gap length for LS2 was measured at the dentin (ceramic = 59.7%; composite = 52.5%), while for RBC, the enamel was more affected (ceramic = 26.2%; composite = 36.9%). (4) Conclusions: OCT enables reliable gap detection in partial crowns under functional loading and is therefore suitable for monitoring adhesive interface integrity. Under in vitro conditions, both materials demonstrated stable adhesive performance without debonding, while material-dependent differences in gap formation and distribution were observed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oberück et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a8c7ecb39a600b3efe22https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14020116
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper