PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS2-03-05: Evaluating the Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative 3D Tomosynthesis in Achieving Negative Resection Margins in DCIS

View Full Paper
SPS. ParpoudiRIR. IosifidouCKC. Kontos

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the impact of preoperative MRI and intraoperative 3D tomosynthesis on achieving negative surgical margins in DCIS patients.
  • Examined 280 DCIS patients treated between 2017-2024.
  • Categorized patients by preoperative MRI use and tomosynthesis during surgery.
  • Analyzed reoperation rates based on DCIS grade, breast density, and age.
  • Reoperations occurred in 16 patients without MRI and 9 with MRI.
  • No significant overall association between MRI use and reoperation rates.
  • Subgroup analysis showed significant effects of breast density and MRI use on reoperation outcomes.
  • Intraoperative use of 3D tomosynthesis was significantly associated with negative margins.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The increased implementation of breast cancer screening programs has led to a rise in the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This, however, has introduced new challenges in the surgical management of DCIS, particularly in achieving negative resection margins. The impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on reducing reoperation rates remains debatable. Furthermore, the use of intraoperative 3D tomosynthesis (3D mammography) to assess surgical specimens presents a potential method for ensuring margin adequacy during surgery. Materials and Methods: From 2017 to 2024, a total of 280 patients diagnosed with DCIS were treated at the Breast Surgical Oncology Department of Anticancer Hospital Theagenio. Among them, 87 were women under 50 years of age and 193 were over 50. The study examined DCIS grade (1, 2, 3), mammographic breast density (ACR categories A-D), and family history. Patients were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative breast MRI and whether 2D or 3D tomosynthesis was used on the surgical specimen. Reoperation rates were then compared across these groups. Results: Out of the 280 patients, 136 did not undergo preoperative breast MRI, while 144 did. Reoperations were required in 16 patients without MRI and 9 with MRI. Although the overall analysis showed no statistically significant association between MRI use and reoperation rate, age and breast density were significantly correlated with reoperation rates (p=0.018 and p=0.001, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that breast density and MRI use significantly influenced reoperation outcomes (p=0.001 and p=0.005, respectively). Additionally, the use of intraoperative 3D tomosynthesis was significantly associated with achieving negative margins (p=0.002). Conclusions: Preoperative breast MRI did not significantly reduce reoperation rates across the entire patient cohort. However, it showed beneficial effects in younger women with dense breast tissue. Intraoperative use of 3D tomosynthesis also contributed to improved surgical outcomes. The combination of these two modalities may represent an effective strategy for reducing reoperation rates in the treatment of DCIS. Keywords: DCIS, breast MRI, intraoperative 3D tomosynthesis, surgical margins, reoperation. Citation Format: S. Parpoudi, R. Iosifidou, C. Kontos, M. Paida, C. Geranou, E. Skourtanioti, V. Xatziravdeli. Evaluating the Role of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Intraoperative 3D Tomosynthesis in Achieving Negative Resection Margins in DCIS abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-03-05.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parpoudi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a957ecb39a600b3f0482https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-03-05
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation improves breast conserving surgery rate but not local disease control in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ2026
  2. 2Abstract GS03-01: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a 12-Gene Expression Assay to Optimize Local Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: 5-year clinical outcomes of E41122024
  3. 3Abstract PO1-23-07: The effect of intra-operative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery for breast cancer in a Dutch cohort2024
  4. 4Abstract PO4-07-08: Impact of an MRI/US fusion imaging for preoperative planning using non-wire localization technique in breast conserving surgery in patients with non-mass enhancement on MRI. A prospective multicenter study2024
  5. 5Abstract PS2-05-28: High-resolution specimen PET-CT imaging for intraoperative margin assessment in early-stage breast cancer: the multicenter BrIMA study2026