PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Analyzing leaping and movement potential at a migratory barrier

View Full Paper
DZDaniel P. Zielinski

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve the understanding of fish passage at migratory barriers using a 3D model.
  • Developed a 3-D stochastic leaping model for analyzing fish movement at barriers.
  • Integrated species-specific behavior with hydraulics from Computational Fluid Dynamics.
  • Applied the model to two case studies for calibration and design.
  • Predicted conditional passage probabilities of < 1% at base flow and ~ 10% at a 200-year flood.
  • Results highlight the influence of barrier geometry, tailwater depth, and flow cues on leaping success.

Abstract

Evaluating passage performance at migratory barriers is essential for managing connectivity within a watershed and is essential for improvements to fish passage and, in some cases, with invasive species control. To quantify upstream passage opportunities at barriers with complex geometry, a 3-D stochastic leaping model that couples species-specific behavior with hydraulics derived from Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations is developed. The model expands on traditional ballistic-trajectory models to evaluate attempts from any location downstream of a barrier and integrates stochastic variation in fish characteristics—including body length, launch speed, and leap origin—while maintaining computationally-derived local velocity and depth inputs in three dimensions. The revised model provides a spatially detailed assessment of conditions most conducive to successful leaping attempts, offering a more comprehensive evaluation of conditional passage probability at migratory barriers. Applied to two case studies (Union Street Dam—calibration; FishPass arc–labyrinth and low-flow weir—design), the model predicted conditional passage probabilities ranged from < 1% at base flow to ~ 10% at a 200-year flood. Results highlight how barrier geometry, tailwater depth, and flow cues shape leaping success, providing actionable guidance for either facilitating desirable passage or strengthening migration barriers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Daniel P. Zielinski (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997b911baf9c852d8c25ea2https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40492-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Integrating fish swimming abilities into rapid road crossing barrier assessment: Case studies in the southeastern United States2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2A kinematic examination of wild sockeye salmon jumping up natural waterfalls2005 · 40 citations
  3. 3A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows2007 · 830 citations
  4. 4More than one million barriers fragment Europe’s rivers2020 · 708 citations
  5. 5Defining Flow Windows for Upstream Passage of Adult Anadromous Salmonids at Cascades and Falls2006 · 48 citations