PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Equine Veterinary Education0 citations

Comparison of cone beam CT and low‐field MRI of the distal limb of 85 horses

View Full Paper
STS. E. TaylorPKP.G. KellyCDC. Daniel

Key Points

  • To compare findings from cone beam CT and MRI in the equine distal limb for better management practices.
  • Reviewed clinical records of horses that underwent both CBCT and MRI on the same day.
  • Categorized key findings from both imaging modalities for comparison.
  • Included imaging of 85 horses, focusing on foot and pastern regions.
  • MRI identified soft tissue injuries in 24 horses that CBCT missed.
  • 44 horses showed increased STIR signal intensity on MRI within bones.
  • CBCT provided clearer evaluation of cortical bone at the navicular and phalanx surfaces.

Abstract

Summary Background Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the equine distal limb under standing sedation are increasingly available, yet there is little published information to guide veterinarians on how both modalities compare to optimise horse management. Objective To describe dual modality CBCT and MRI findings in the equine distal limb of images acquired in the standing sedated horse for clinical purposes. Study design Retrospective descriptive study. Methods Clinical records, CBCT and MRI DICOM images of patients that underwent advanced imaging of the distal limb with both modalities on the same day (April 2024 to April 2025) were reviewed. Key imaging findings were categorised to allow comparison of CBCT and MRI findings. Results Imaging studies of 85 horses met the inclusion criteria, resulting in imaging of 120 foot and 38 pastern regions. Twenty‐four of 85 horses had a primary soft tissue injury that was detected on MRI only. Forty‐four horses had increased STIR signal intensity on MRI within the phalanges or navicular bone. CBCT identified a small sequestration of the distal phalanx that was identified on MRI retrospectively, subsequent to CBCT evaluation. CBCT allowed clearer evaluation of cortical bone, specifically at the margins of the flexor cortex of the navicular bone and the articular surfaces of the phalanges. Main limitations Imaging findings were not verified by a gold standard and are subjective and descriptive. Categorical representation of primary diagnosis was difficult for some horses. The horses evaluated are limited to a mixed referral population of horses in Scotland. Conclusions The primary diagnosis was based on MRI in more horses than on CBCT due to the ability of MRI to identify soft‐tissue injury. Combined MRI and CBCT imaging of the foot can provide additional information in horses with solar penetration or when careful evaluation of the cortical bone is needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taylor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa03ad1d9b11b3452dbahttps://doi.org/10.1111/eve.70059
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper