PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Lara D. Veeken0 citations

The use of non-TNF targeted biologics in Behçet’s Disease: Real-life data from the International AIDA Network Behçet’s Disease Registry

View Full Paper
GSGizem SevikGLG. LopalcoFIF. Iannone

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the real-world use, effectiveness, and safety of non-TNF biologics in Behçet’s Disease patients.
  • Data collected from the International AIDA Network Registry for Behçet’s Disease.
  • Included patients who received non-TNF biologics during follow-up.
  • Evaluated clinical and demographic characteristics, prior treatments, and responses at 3, 6, and 12 months.
  • 65 patients included, with an average age of 45.8 years.
  • Anakinra had a partial or complete response in a majority of patients with mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, and ocular involvement.
  • Canakinumab and tocilizumab also showed effectiveness, especially in ocular and neurological cases.
  • No new major safety concerns reported across various treatment groups.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Refractory manifestations of Behçet’s disease (BD) are commonly treated with TNF-α inhibitors; however, a subset of patients do not respond or are intolerant, prompting the need for alternative therapies. This study aimed to assess the real-life use, efficacy, and safety of non-TNF targeted biologic agents in BD. Methods Data were retrieved from the International AIDA Network Registry for BD. Patients who received any biological agent other than TNF-α inhibitors at any point during follow-up were included in the study. Clinical and demographic characteristics, prior treatments, and treatment responses at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were collected. Results In total, 65 patients (36 female/29 male) with a mean age of 45.8 ± 13.3 years were included. Anakinra was the most frequently used agent (n = 31), 34.7% of patients with mucocutaneous, 73.3% with musculoskeletal, and 77.7% with ocular involvement showing a partial or complete response. Canakinumab (n = 11) was effective in mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, and ocular involvement, including some previously unresponsive to anakinra. Tocilizumab (n = 15) showed favorable outcomes in ocular and neurological involvement (complete response in 5 of 6 patients), while 40% experienced worsening or no response in mucocutaneous manifestations. Secukinumab and ixekizumab were effective in patients with mucocutaneous-articular phenotypes, especially those with axial spondyloarthritis. Ustekinumab (n = 3) and rituximab (n = 5) also demonstrated clinical improvement in selected refractory cases. No new major safety concerns were reported across treatment groups. Conclusion Biologics targeting IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-12/23 pathways may offer therapeutic alternatives in BD patients unresponsive to TNF-α inhibitors. The treatment efficacy varies across phenotypes, highlighting the need for individualized treatment decisions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sevik et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa6dad1d9b11b3453a3dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag086
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rituximab in intractable ocular lesions of Behcet’s disease; randomized single‐blind control study (pilot study)2010 · 229 citations
  2. 2Tocilizumab treatment for neuro-Behcet's disease, the first report2011 · 95 citations
  3. 3The Role of IL-6 in Skin Fibrosis and Cutaneous Wound Healing2020 · 532 citations
  4. 4Secukinumab in the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis: Results of Three Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials2013 · 369 citations
  5. 5Neuro-Behçet’s disease presenting with tumour-like lesions and responding to rituximab2016 · 26 citations