PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2026Behavioral Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

“Oh, You’ve Come to Visit the Yard?”: Phenotypic Capital, Intragroup Marginalization, and the Gated Sanctuary in Black LGBTQ+ Communities

View Full Paper
KWKeith J. WattsSTShawndaya S. ThrasherNCNicole Campbell

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore exclusionary dynamics and internal hierarchies within Black LGBTQ+ communities.
  • Utilized Reflexive Thematic Analysis on open-ended survey responses from 74 Black LGBTQ+ adults
  • Analyzed data from a larger mixed-methods study
  • Identified patterns of intragroup gatekeeping through a six-phase recursive process.
  • Revealed that community sanctuary is restricted due to hierarchies of skin tone and socioeconomic status
  • Identified three themes: Phenotypic Capital and Authenticity, Socioeconomic Gatekeeping, and Policing the Binary
  • Highlighted that access to community resilience requires negotiation and is not universally available.

Abstract

Identity-based communities that share common characteristics, beliefs, and experiences (e.g., Black LGBTQ+ communities) have historically been conceptualized as protective bubbles that buffer Black LGBTQ+ individuals against the deleterious effects of systemic racism and cisheterosexism. However, this monolithic narrative often masks the internal power dynamics that divide belonging. This study explores the exclusionary dynamics embedded within these safe spaces, examining how internal hierarchies of skin tone, socioeconomic status, and gender performance function as proximal stressors. Guided by a critical constructivist paradigm, this study utilized Reflexive Thematic Analysis to analyze open-ended survey responses from 74 Black LGBTQ+ adults. Data were drawn from a larger mixed-methods study and analyzed using a six-phase recursive process to identify latent patterns of intragroup gatekeeping. The analysis revealed that the sanctuary of the community is restricted. Three primary themes emerged: (1) Phenotypic Capital and the Politics of Authenticity, where lighter skin tone triggered authenticity scrutiny and darker skin tone faced rejection based on physical appearance; (2) Socioeconomic Gatekeeping, where belonging was stratified by the cost of participation and protective insularity within working-class spaces; and (3) Policing the Binary, where rigid adherence to gender archetypes created a landscape of performance surveillance. Access to community resilience is not a universal right but a negotiated status contingent upon the payment of a resilience tax. To promote genuine health equity, researchers and practitioners working with this population must move beyond the uncritical referral to “community” and actively dismantle the internalized systems of oppression that fracture collective survival.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Watts et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6997fa90ad1d9b11b3453ddehttps://doi.org/10.3390/bs16020292
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1“Even when I feel alone, I always know I’m not really alone”: An intersectional analysis of LGBTQIA+–BIPOC's experiences of community and resistance2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Intersectional belonging and the social cure: Identity centrality as a pathway to well-being for Black LGBTQ+ adults2026
  3. 3Pecola’s People: Microhistories, the Politics of Respectability, and Interrogations of the Power of the Outside Gaze2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Shades of belonging: my identity in black and white2025
  5. 5Black American Communities: From Pathology to Intersectionality2024