PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Factors influencing students’ intentions to continue learning in AI-assisted painting courses

View Full Paper
YLYang Eric LiYYYi YangLCLu Chen

Key Points

  • This study investigates factors influencing students' continuance learning intention in AI-assisted drawing courses.
  • Mixed-methods approach employing structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)
  • Examined 365 university students' perceptions and intentions regarding AI-assisted drawing
  • Analyzed predictive effects of various psychological and contextual variables
  • Attitude was found to have the most significant influence on students' Behavioral Intention
  • Performance expectancy and perceived coolness positively influenced intention
  • Anxiety negatively impacted students' Behavioral Intention
  • Self-efficacy positively affected continuance learning intention
  • The variance in continuance learning intention was explained by 77.1% and behavioral intention by 52.4%

Abstract

As an emerging pedagogical approach in art education, artificial intelligence-assisted drawing holds significant value in enhancing students’ creative abilities and digital literacy. However, students’ continuance learning intention and its underlying mechanisms in AI-assisted drawing courses remain underexplored. This study aims to systematically investigate the key factors influencing students’ continuance learning intention in AI-assisted drawing courses, guided by coolness theory and expectancy-value theory as theoretical frameworks. Using a mixed-methods approach combining structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), this research examined the predictive effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, perceived coolness, attitude, and anxiety on college students’ Behavioral Intention among 365 university students. The SEM analysis revealed that attitude exerted the most significant influence on students’ Behavioral Intention, while performance expectancy and perceived coolness also demonstrated significant positive effects, and anxiety showed a significant negative impact. Additionally, self-efficacy had a significant positive effect on students’ continuance learning intention. These factors collectively explained 77.1% of the variance in students’ continuance learning intention (R²), while explaining 52.4% of the variance in behavioral intention. Furthermore, gender moderated the path from perceived usefulness to continuance intention, and grade level moderated the path from self-efficacy to continuance intention. The fsQCA results revealed that students’ continuance learning intention is not determined by a single factor but achieved through various combinations of multiple factors, with five configurational solutions identified as leading to similar outcomes. At the theoretical level, this study successfully applied coolness theory and expectancy-value theory to the context of AI-assisted art education, expanding the applicability of these theories in creative technology learning and revealing the interactive mechanisms among cognitive appraisal, technology perception, and social influence. At the practical level, the findings provide empirical evidence and diversified intervention strategies for teachers, schools, and curriculum designers to optimize AI-assisted drawing instruction, cultivate students’ positive attitudes, and enhance their technological experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69990de85b97ab4c14ac281chttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40663-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper