Deep learning has markedly improved protein structure prediction, yet significant challenges persist in modeling both accuracy and conformational heterogeneity. We systematically evaluated AlphaFold3, BioEmu, Boltz-2, and Chai-1 on proteins with experimentally resolved apo and holo states, including the MATE family efflux transporter PfMATE, the lysine/arginine/ornithine-binding protein (LAOBP), and the protein translocase subunit SecA. While holo-state predictions generally aligned well with experimental structures, apo-state predictions were often biased toward holo-like conformations, underrepresenting the diverse ensembles characteristic of ligand-free proteins. For PfMATE, which adopts inward- and outward-facing apo conformations, all models predicted only the outward-facing state, missing the rare inward-facing structure. Similarly, apo predictions of LAOBP and SecA collapsed toward holo or intermediate states instead of reflecting true apo diversity. These findings reveal a systematic bias: current deep learning models preferentially generate stable holo-like folds while underrepresenting the structural variability and rare conformations characteristic of ligand-free states.
Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: