PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Procedia Structural Integrity0 citationsOpen Access

Modelling strategies for structural units within masonry aggregates

View Full Paper
MPMaria Eleonora PipistrelliCPChiara PepiGFGianluca Fagotti

Key Points

  • The aim is to define and model structural units within masonry aggregates accurately for seismic evaluation.
  • Analyzed a case study in Todi, Italy, focusing on a school building's structural unit.
  • Modeled structural unit in three configurations with varying extents of adjacent portions included.
  • Conducted historical and structural analysis to inform the modeling process.
  • Identified that a limited extent of adjacent buildings improved modeling accuracy.
  • Confirmed increased stiffness and favorable damage distribution in the model.
  • Demonstrated a notable increase in structural capacity with effective modeling strategies.

Abstract

Many historic centers in Italy are composed of masonry aggregates—clusters of adjoining buildings developed over time. Within these aggregates, it is often possible to identify structural units (S.U.s), which represent the smallest portions with potential for independent structural behavior. When retrofitting interventions are required, it is essential to correctly define the extent of the intervention unit and understand how to model it accurately, without the need to simulate the entire aggregate. In this study, a case located in Todi (Italy), specifically the north-east corner of a school building, is investigated as a representative S.U. within a masonry aggregate. Based on historical and structural analysis, the S.U. is modeled in three different configurations, with varying extents of adjacent portions included. The goal is to evaluate the extent of the surrounding aggregate that has to be modeled to reliably reproduce the S.U.’s seismic behavior. Results are evaluated through capacity curves and validated against damage patterns observed on site. The analysis confirms that including a limited extent of the adjacent buildings is sufficient to significantly improve the accuracy of the structural model, particularly in terms of stiffness and damage distribution. The model shows a notable increase in capacity, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed modelling strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pipistrelli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994a7f873532290d01ee4bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.12.243
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Seismic performance of irregular masonry aggregates: Effects of localized retrofitting on individual structural units2025
  2. 2Aggregated vs. Isolated Seismic Response of a Historic Masonry Compound Before and After Integrated Retrofit Interventions2026
  3. 3Evaluation of the seismic capacity of cultural heritage in case of aggregate buildings: the castle of Rosignano Marittimo2024
  4. 4The Influence of the Aggregate Configuration on the Seismic Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in Historic Urban Areas2024 · 13 citations
  5. 5Nonlinear modelling for the seismic vulnerability of complex monumental masonry buildings: a case study2026