PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026BMC Cardiovascular Disorders0 citationsOpen Access

Racial and sex differences in acute pericarditis among emergency department chest pain patients: a retrospective cohort study

JEJoshua EmakhuWSWanting SuJJJamie Joseph

Key Result

Non-Hispanic Black men presenting with chest pain had a 72% higher adjusted risk of acute pericarditis compared to non-Hispanic White women (aRR 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.69).

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how race and sex influence the risk of acute pericarditis among emergency department patients.
  • Retrospective cohort design using electronic health records from 10 emergency departments.
  • Patients included were ≥ 18 years and self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White.
  • Acute pericarditis was identified using specific ICD codes with supporting clinical documentation.
  • Generalized linear models estimated risk ratios for race, sex, and their interaction.
  • Among 114,517 ED chest pain visits, 346 cases of acute pericarditis were identified (0.30%).
  • Non-Hispanic Black men had a significantly higher adjusted risk of acute pericarditis (RR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.10–2.69) compared to non-Hispanic White women.
  • Higher adjusted predicted risk for men across both racial groups, particularly among non-Hispanic Black men.
  • Sensitivity analyses excluding the COVID-19 period showed similar results.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=114,517)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does non-Hispanic Black male race/sex increase the risk of acute pericarditis in adult emergency department patients presenting with chest pain?

P
Population
114,517 adult patients (≥ 18 years) self-identifying as non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White presenting with chest pain to 10 emergency departments in a large integrated health system in Michigan, US (2016–2022). Excluded: STEMI, missing data, Hispanic or other races.
I
Intervention
Non-Hispanic Black male demographic (observational exposure)
C
Comparator
Non-Hispanic White female demographic (reference category)
O
Outcome
Diagnosis of acute pericarditis (identified using ICD-10 codes I30.x supported by clinical documentation)

Main Result

Effect estimate: Adjusted Risk Ratio 1.72 (95% CI 1.10-2.69)

Absolute Event Rate: 0.53% vs 0.21%

p-value: p=<0.05

Limitations

  • Single health system retrospective study using administrative ICD-10 coding which may cause misclassification.
  • Diagnosis of acute pericarditis could not be confirmed by manual chart review or objective diagnostic criteria.
  • Small sample sizes in some race-sex subgroups limited statistical power and precision.
  • Unmeasured confounding such as healthcare access and provider bias not accounted for.
  • Unable to examine specific etiologies or recurrence due to data limitations.
  • Findings may not be generalizable beyond the study's urban and regional context.
  • Single health system retrospective study using administrative coding (ICD-10) which may misclassify or underdiagnose
  • Diagnoses could not be confirmed by manual chart review
  • Rare event (346 cases) limiting statistical power for subgroup analyses

Abstract

Acute pericarditis is a rare diagnosis among emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain, and how race and sex jointly influence risk remains poorly characterized. We evaluated race–sex heterogeneity in acute pericarditis risk using interaction-based and marginal analytic approaches. This retrospective cohort study utilized patient-level electronic health records from 10 EDs in a large integrated health system (2016–2022). Adult patients (≥ 18 years) self-identifying as non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White and presenting with chest pain were included. Acute pericarditis was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes I30.x, supported by clinical documentation. Generalized linear models with log link and robust variance estimated risk ratios (RRs) for race, sex, and their interaction. Because interaction models yield conditional coefficients, inference focused on race–sex contrasts and on marginal predicted probabilities derived from recycled prediction methods. Among 114,517 ED chest pain visits, 346 (0.30%) met criteria for acute pericarditis, including n = 151 non-Hispanic Black patients and n = 195 non-Hispanic White patients. Evidence of race–sex effect modification was observed. Compared with non-Hispanic White women, non-Hispanic Black men had a statistically significantly higher adjusted risk of acute pericarditis (RR = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.10–2.69). Marginal estimates indicated higher adjusted predicted risk among men across both racial groups, with the highest absolute and relative risks among non-Hispanic Black men. Results from sensitivity analyses excluding the COVID-19 period were similar. Despite the rarity of the disease, acute pericarditis has clinically significant heterogeneity among race–sex subgroups. Marginal estimates based on interaction suggest that non-Hispanic Black men have the highest risk, suggesting the utility of intersectional demographic analysis in ED chest pain triage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Emakhu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Adult emergency department patients (≥18 years) with chest pain self-identifying as non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White (n=114,517). Non-Hispanic Black men presenting with chest pain had a 72% higher adjusted risk of acute pericarditis compared to non-Hispanic White women (aRR 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.69).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994a7f873532290d01ef06https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-05601-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper