PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Veterinary and Animal Science0 citationsOpen Access

Introduction of a standardized semi-quantitative body condition scoring system for cattle and pigs in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

View Full Paper
PKPaige Rudin KinzieSMSydney MerrittBLBoniface Lombe

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance veterinary assessments of livestock health by standardizing body condition scores in the DRC.
  • Piloted and validated a six-point body condition scoring system.
  • Conducted 124 site visits across nine provinces in the DRC.
  • Compared BCS ratings with animal health indicators across swine and bovine subjects.
  • BCS ratings significantly varied by site type and animal age.
  • Variations in BCS ratings were noted based on health history and presence of lesions.
  • Achieved an inter-rater reliability agreement with a maximum difference of 1 score unit among assessors.

Abstract

To improve the standardization of veterinary assessments of livestock health and welfare across the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), we piloted and validated the implementation of a multispecies semiquantitative six-point body condition scoring (BCS) system for use in farms, abattoirs, and free-range village herds. BCS systems indicating animal energy balance and overall systemic health are critical to rapid and accurate veterinary surveillance to prevent the spread of zoonotic disease and ensure a safe food supply, among other One Health implications. Livestock species may be intermingled in Congolese agricultural settings, requiring a standard BCS scale; we harmonized existing species-specific scales to improve traditional approaches limited to qualitative assessment only. With a team of Congolese veterinarians and technicians, we completed 124 site visits across nine provinces between June 2023 and July 2024, comparing BCS ratings with various animal health indicators to identify patterns and relationships across 1038 swine and 1157 bovine subjects. Results indicate BCS ratings varied significantly by site type (p < 0.001) and age (p < 0.001), as well as between animals with reported histories of illness (p < 0.001) and lesions at the time of sampling (p = 0.089). At selected sites, the investigation team achieved an agreement with a maximum difference of 1 score unit between raters in an assessment of inter-rater reliability (n = 36, κ = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.22-0.73) and qualitatively reported improved assessment precision with the six-point system compared to previous unstandardized processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kinzie et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994a7f873532290d01efa0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2026.100601
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper