PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Procedia Structural Integrity0 citationsOpen Access

Cost-benefit analysis of fire-protected steel buildings for vehicle storage

View Full Paper
ACAntonio CibelliDSDonatella de SilvaPSPaola De Santis

Key Points

  • To assess fire vulnerability of steel buildings and conduct a cost-benefit analysis to identify effective protective solutions.
  • Developed fragility curves for assessing fire vulnerability.
  • Evaluated 36 realistic fire scenarios for steel buildings.
  • Compared configurations of unprotected and protected buildings with sprayed plaster of varying thickness.
  • Conducted a cost-benefit analysis based on fire performance and economic factors.
  • Identified fragility curves that quantify fire vulnerability in steel buildings.
  • Demonstrated varying effectiveness of different plaster thicknesses for fire protection.
  • Revealed potential economic benefits by improving fire safety measures in building design.

Abstract

Fire safety plays a central role in the design of industrial steel buildings due to the high vulnerability of the material to elevated temperatures. Although fire safety engineering provides advanced tools to optimize structural design, the widespread adoption of a performance-based approach for protected structures is still hindered by significant regulatory gaps. In this study an integrated methodology for assessing fire vulnerability through fragility curves is presented and validated through the application to a representative steel building, intended for vehicle storage. The analysis is carried out with respect to 36 realistic fire scenarios, considering both unprotected configuration and protected with sprayed plaster of different thickness. The resulting fragility curves serve as basis to develop a cost-benefit analysis aimed at identifying the most effective protective solution, conjugating technical performance in fire and economic sustainability. The study, thus, offers a contribution in the perspective of using the performance-based approach to improve the decision-making process within the design of passive fire protection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cibelli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994aab873532290d01f031https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2025.12.156
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Performance-Based Assessment Methodology for Retrofit of Buildings2019 · 42 citations
  2. 2Modeling structures in fire with SAFIR ® : theoretical background and capabilities2017 · 293 citations
  3. 3Fire protection costs in composite buildings for cost-benefit analysis of fire designs2024 · 20 citations
  4. 4Engineering relations for fire plumes1984 · 357 citations
  5. 5Development of an analytical model to predict the radiative heat flux to a vertical element due to a localised fire2019 · 42 citations