PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Musculoskeletal Science and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Responsiveness of central sensitization-related measures in older people with chronic low back pain

View Full Paper
LMLarissa Bragança Falcão MarquesLNLeandro Alberto Calazans NogueiraRNRobert Resende Nascimento

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the responsiveness of central sensitization measures in older adults with chronic low back pain.
  • Prospective pre-post interventional study design
  • Participants aged 60+ with chronic low back pain
  • 8-week group exercise program
  • Measured pain intensity, disability, CSI, and CPM pre- and post-intervention
  • Calculated effect sizes and standardized response mean for responsiveness
  • Pain and disability measures had high responsiveness (effect sizes and SRM >0.7)
  • CSI showed moderate responsiveness (effect size and SRM >0.3)
  • CPM measures showed little responsiveness
  • Pain and disability better identified recovery compared to CSI and CPM
  • Subgroup analyses suggested that higher baseline CSI scores improve responsiveness of CSI

Abstract

To determine the responsiveness of central sensitization measures, Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), in older adults undergoing an exercise program and to compare their responsiveness with outcomes measures of pain and disability. This is a prospective registered (RBR-2qyc425) responsiveness study with a pre-post interventional study design. People aged 60 years and over with chronic non-specific low back pain were recruited. Demographic and clinical data were collected before and after an 8-week group exercise program. The CSI, CPM test, pain intensity and disability were collected at baseline and post-intervention. The GPE scale was collected post-intervention. Responsiveness was determined by calculating effect sizes, standardized response mean (SRM) and the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC). We also conducted subgroup analyses to investigate the responsiveness of these measures in participants classified as: recovered versus not recovered, CPM-efficient versus CPM-inefficient and as having high versus low CSI scores. 118 participants completed the study. Pain and disability were the most responsive measures (effect sizes and SRM >0.7), followed by CSI (effect size and SRM >0.3). The CPM measures were not responsive. Pain and disability were also more responsive in identifying those participants who recovered after treatment (AUC > 0.70) compared to CSI and CPM measures (AUC< 0.70). In addition, CSI showed a moderate to good correlation (0.52) with disability and little or no correlation (0.24) with pain. The CPM measures showed little or no correlation with pain and disability. Our subgroup analyses showed that CSI and CPM may be more responsive in patients with higher baseline CSI scores and those classified as CPM-inefficient, respectively Current measures of central sensitization are not as responsive as clinical outcomes of disability and pain. Central sensitization measures should not be used to monitor improvement with exercise intervention in older adults with non-specific low back pain. Future studies investigating the responsiveness of these measures in more precisely defined subgroups and using contemporary operational definitions are warranted. • Disability and pain were responsive in older adults with chronic low back pain (cLBP). • Current measures of central sensitization are not as responsive as clinical outcomes. • Central sensitization–related measures may be responsive in patient subgroups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marques et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994b01873532290d01f4c8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103519
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper