PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation0 citationsOpen Access

Hip joint contact forces and muscle contributions between bounce and standard squats

TKTaewoong KongBABasil AchermannGLGyeongeun Lee

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the effects of bounce squats on hip joint contact forces and specific muscle contributions compared to standard squats.
  • Nine resistance-trained participants performed both bounce and standard squats across various loads.
  • Three-dimensional motion capture and force plates assessed hip joint contact forces.
  • Electromyography captured muscle contributions, particularly from hamstrings and gluteus maximus.
  • Two-way repeated measures ANOVA analyzed differences between squat types and load conditions.
  • Bounce squats resulted in significantly greater peak hip joint contact forces compared to standard squats.
  • Muscle contributions from hamstrings and gluteus maximus were higher during bounce squats.
  • Peak hip flexion angles and net joint moments were also greater in bounce squats across all loads.

Abstract

Bounce squats, involving a rapid eccentric-concentric transition, are used in strength training to enhance force production via the stretch-shortening cycle. However, its effects on hip joint contact force (JCF) and muscle-specific contributions remain unclear. This study investigated the hip JCF and individual muscle contributions during bounce and standard squats. Nine healthy resistance-trained participants (7 males, 2 females; ≥3 years of resistance training experience) performed four trials each of bounce and standard squats across five loads (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of body weight). Three-dimensional motion capture, force plates, and electromyography data were used to estimate hip JCF and muscle contributions via musculoskeletal modeling and simulation. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare hip JCF and muscle contributions between squat types and load conditions. Peak hip flexion angles (F(4, 32) = 3.58, p < 0.015, η2p = 0.31) and peak hip net joint moments (F (4, 32) = 3.44, p < 0.018, η2p = 0.30) were significantly greater in bounce than standard squats across loads. Peak hip JCF was also greater in bounce squats (F(1, 8) = 44.97, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.84). This increase was attributed to greater hamstrings (F(1, 8) = 23.98, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.75) and gluteus maximus (F(1, 8) = 13.40, p = 0.006, η2p = 0.63) contributions. Bounce squats increase hip JCF compared with standard squats, primarily due to greater hamstrings and gluteus maximus contributions. While the bounce strategy may offer performance benefits, the associated increase in mechanical hip joint loading may represent a potential risk factor that warrants consideration during resistance training.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994b64873532290d01f8a1https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01603-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Acute Effect of the Bounce Technique on Joint Angles, Net Joint Moments, and Muscle Activity in the Free Weight Back Squat2026
  2. 2Reduced metabolic energy cost in bounce squats driven by lower vasti contribution during the eccentric phase2026
  3. 3Acute Effect of the Bounce Squat on Ground Reaction Force at the Turning Point and Barbell Kinematics.2025
  4. 4Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Squat Jumps2026
  5. 5Hip and knee joint work modulate single-leg lateral jump performance despite the ankle being the primary contributor2026