PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Alexandria Engineering Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Esophageal tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting: Materials, vascularization, and functional reconstruction

View Full Paper
BSBin SunMLMiao LiCCChaoyu Cui

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore advancements in esophageal tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting for functional reconstruction.
  • Review of recent literature on esophageal tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting techniques.
  • Evaluation of scaffold designs, including biodegradable materials and hybrid scaffolds.
  • Discussion of vascularization strategies like endothelial co-culture and bioreactor approaches.
  • Innovative scaffold designs promote epithelial and muscle regeneration.
  • Continued challenges exist with achieving robust vascularization.
  • Preclinical and preliminary clinical findings show promise in restoring esophageal function.

Abstract

Replacement of the esophagus remains one of the most formidable challenges in reconstructive surgery due to its unique anatomical and functional demands. Conventional approaches such as gastric pull-up or colonic interposition frequently fail to restore peristalsis and often result in significant morbidity, underscoring the need for innovative strategies. Esophageal tissue engineering and 3D bioprinting have emerged as promising alternatives, leveraging biodegradable polymers, decellularized matrices, and hybrid scaffolds to mimic the multilayered architecture of the native esophagus. Recent advances in scaffold design, including electrospinning and spatially organized bioprinting, have enabled the development of constructs that promote epithelialization, smooth muscle regeneration, and biomechanical integrity. However, achieving robust vascularization remains a critical hurdle, with strategies ranging from bioactive coatings and endothelial co-culture to in vivo bioreactor techniques and omentopexy-assisted grafting. Functional restoration is further complicated by the need for organized muscle orientation, innervation, and peristaltic coordination, which are only partially realized in current models. Despite these challenges, preclinical studies and pioneering clinical applications have demonstrated the feasibility of restoring esophageal continuity, epithelial barrier function, and partial contractility. This review consolidates progress over the past decade, evaluates ongoing controversies regarding scaffold composition, vascularization strategies, and the role of cellularization, and highlights future directions toward reproducible, patient-specific, and clinically translatable constructs. With continued interdisciplinary innovations, bioengineered esophageal grafts hold the potential to transform treatment paradigms for esophageal atresia, caustic injury, and malignancy, ultimately moving closer to functional replacements that replicate the complexity of the native organ.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994ba9873532290d01fc67https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2026.02.010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Embedding Biomimetic Vascular Networks via Coaxial Sacrificial Writing into Functional Tissue2024 · 89 citations
  2. 2Recent Advances of Biomedical Scaffolds for Esophageal Regeneration2025 · 4 citations
  3. 33D printing of biomimetic vasculature for tissue regeneration2019 · 118 citations
  4. 4Multi-layered Free-form 3D Cell-printed Tubular Construct with Decellularized Inner and Outer Esophageal Tissue-derived Bioinks2020 · 80 citations
  5. 5Successful Total Tracheal Replacement by Cryopreserved Aortic Allograft in a Patient Post-COVID-19 Infection2021 · 19 citations