PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology0 citationsOpen Access

Planned anatomy-guided dual-sided (“Sandwich”) ablation improves recurrence-free survival in idiopathic premature ventricular contractions: a propensity-matched cohort study

STSerkan TopalogluAKAhmet KorkmazEHElif Hande

Key Result

Planned anatomy-guided dual-sided ('sandwich') ablation improved recurrence-free survival to 94.8% versus 78.4% with conventional ablation (p=0.001) in patients with idiopathic PVCs.

Key Points

  • To evaluate if a dual-sided ('sandwich') ablation strategy enhances long-term outcomes for patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study of 412 patients undergoing catheter ablation for IPVCs.
  • Performed 1:1 propensity score matching for significant clinical factors yielding 97 matched pairs.
  • Applied a dual-sided ablation technique using radiofrequency on both adjacent and opposing myocardial surfaces.
  • Sandwich ablation led to 94.8% recurrence-free survival compared to 78.4% with standard ablation (p = 0.001).
  • Patients with earliest activation time > -30 ms showed even greater benefits (92.5% vs. 60.5%; p < 0.001).
  • Sandwich ablation was identified as an independent predictor of reduced recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.28; p = 0.013).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=194)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a planned anatomy-guided dual-sided ('sandwich') ablation strategy improve recurrence-free survival compared to conventional ablation in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions?

P
Population
194 propensity-matched patients undergoing catheter ablation for idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (IPVCs), mean age 50.6, 52.1% male. Excluded: prior PVC ablation, requirement for bipolar/alcohol ablation, significant structural heart disease.
I
Intervention
Planned anatomy-guided dual-sided ('sandwich') ablation strategy: conventional ablation at the earliest activation site followed by systematic radiofrequency applications from anatomically adjacent or opposing myocardial surfaces.
C
Comparator
Conventional ablation: ablation at the earliest activation site only, followed by a 30-minute observation period without additional lesions.
O
Outcome
Recurrence-free survival, defined as absence of documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia or PVC burden > 1% on follow-up Holter studies at 3, 6, and 12 months.composite

A planned dual-sided 'sandwich' ablation strategy significantly improves recurrence-free survival in patients with idiopathic PVCs, particularly those with earliest activation times > -30 ms, without increasing procedural complications.

Main Result

Effect estimate: p=0.001

Absolute Event Rate: 94.8% vs 78.4%

p-value: p=0.001

Limitations

  • Retrospective single-center design with inherent biases despite propensity matching
  • Operator-dependent application of sandwich ablation may introduce variability
  • Electroanatomic mapping and earliest activation timing measurements may vary
  • No routine mapping of adjacent venous or arterial structures with dedicated tissue
  • Epicardial access was not employed limiting confirmation of intramural or epicardial substrate
  • Findings require prospective multicenter randomized validation before broad clinical application
  • Operator identity and experience were not incorporated into the matching model and may represent residual confounding

Abstract

Catheter ablation of idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (IPVCs) is often challenged by intramural or anatomically complex substrates, where targeting only the site of earliest activation may result in insufficient lesion transmurality and arrhythmia recurrence. We aimed to determine whether a planned, anatomy-guided dual-sided (“sandwich”) ablation strategy improves long-term clinical outcomes compared with conventional ablation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing catheter ablation for IPVCs. After exclusions, 412 patients were eligible, and 1:1 propensity score matching based on left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS duration, PVC burden, and anatomical localization yielded 97 well-balanced pairs (n = 194). The planned sandwich ablation strategy consisted of conventional ablation at the earliest activation site followed by systematic radiofrequency applications from anatomically adjacent or opposing myocardial surfaces. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, defined as absence of sustained ventricular arrhythmia or PVC burden > 1% during follow-up; major complications constituted secondary endpoints. Among 194 propensity-matched patients (mean age 50.6 ± 11.3 years; 52.1% male), sandwich ablation was associated with significantly higher recurrence-free survival compared with conventional ablation (94.8% vs. 78.4%; p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a marked benefit of sandwich ablation in patients with earliest activation time > − 30 ms (92.5% vs. 60.5%; p < 0.001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, sandwich ablation emerged as an independent predictor of reduced recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio 0.28; 95% CI 0.10–0.76; p = 0.013). Major complication rates were comparable between groups. Planned dual-sided ablation may improve recurrence-free survival in IPVCs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Topaloglu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Adults with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions undergoing catheter ablation (n=194). planned anatomy-guided dual-sided ('sandwich') catheter ablation vs. conventional catheter ablation targeting only earliest activation site was evaluated on recurrence-free survival defined as absence of sustained ventricular arrhythmia or PVC burden > 1% on ECG or Holter at follow-up (p=0.001, p=0.001). Planned anatomy-guided dual-sided ('sandwich') ablation improved recurrence-free survival to 94.8% versus 78.4% with conventional ablation (p=0.001) in patients with idiopathic PVCs.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994bef873532290d02009bhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02252-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper