PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Australian Veterinary Journal0 citations

Two cases of Ehrlichia canis acquired locally in Victoria

View Full Paper
RHRJA HughesACAA CiavarellaNCNF Courtman

Key Points

  • The research aims to describe two cases of Ehrlichia canis infections in dogs without travel histories.
  • Evaluated clinical signs including anaemia and thrombocytopenia in two dogs.
  • Utilized immunofluorescence and PCR for diagnosis.
  • Administered immunosuppressive treatments followed by doxycycline.
  • Performed serological testing to confirm Ehrlichia canis.
  • Case 1 showed positive PCR and intracytoplasmic inclusions; survived 33 months post-diagnosis.
  • Case 2 tested serologically positive but PCR negative; died 11 weeks after diagnosis due to suspected septic shock.

Abstract

A 10‐year‐old, female desexed, Yorkshire Terrier (case 1) and a 2‐year‐old, female entire, Great Dane (case 2) were referred for incidentally detected anaemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperglobulinaemia, pyrexia and neutropenia, respectively. Both dogs lived in central Victoria and had no history of travel outside of the state. Both cases were presumptively diagnosed with immune‐mediated disease affecting the bone marrow and treated with immunosuppressive agents (prednisolone, cyclosporine and mycophenolate, respectively). Failure of response to therapy prompted further investigation which confirmed the diagnosis of Ehrlichia. In case 1, intracytoplasmic inclusions (morulae) were observed in splenic aspirates and subsequent immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were positive for Ehrlichia canis . In case 2, serology was positive for Ehrlichia (>1:5120), but PCR was negative. Both dogs were treated with doxycycline. Case 1 was also treated with rifampicin, and case 2 received eltrombopag to stimulate bone marrow production. Case 1 remains alive 33 months following diagnosis. Case 2 had refractory neutropenia and died of suspected septic shock 11 weeks after diagnosis. To the authors' knowledge, these are the first cases of Ehrlichia canis detected in Victoria with no history of travel to endemic areas. Practicing veterinarians in this area should consider Ehrlichiosis as a differential diagnosis in dogs presenting with relevant clinical signs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hughes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c38873532290d0208fahttps://doi.org/10.1111/avj.70065
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Endemic Ehrlichia canis infection in a dog from Ireland: case report2026
  2. 2Molecular Confirmation, Epidemiology, and Pathophysiology of Ehrlichia canis Prevalence in Eastern India2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Molecular Confirmation, Epidemiology, and Pathophysiology of Ehrlichia canis Prevalence in Eastern India2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Canine ehrlichiosis: relapse and prevention2025
  5. 5Ehrlichia canis Infection in a Labrador Retriever Dog: A Case Report2024 · 1 citations