PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Management and Organization Review0 citationsOpen Access

Digital Poverty in the Global South

FOFred OforiSMStelvia MatosMTMahdi Tavalaei

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze barriers to digital participation in the Global South and propose strategies for inclusion.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review of 122 empirical studies from 2003 to 2024
  • Focused on digital issues in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Oceania
  • Utilized stakeholder theory and digital ecosystems theory for analysis
  • Identified ecosystem fragmentation as a key bottleneck for digital inclusion
  • Introduced the concept of Ecosystem Coordination Stakeholders (ECS) for improved coordination
  • Highlighted the importance of tailored policy frameworks to enhance institutional capacity

Abstract

Abstract Despite substantial digital investment and stakeholder initiatives, billions in the Global South remain excluded from digital participation. This systematic literature review synthesizes 122 empirical studies published between 2003 and 2024 in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Oceania to analyze key stakeholders, their challenges, and the strategies employed to foster sustainable digital inclusion. Drawing on stakeholder theory and digital ecosystems theory, the study identifies ecosystem fragmentation as a central bottleneck. We advance stakeholder theory by introducing the concept of Ecosystem Coordination Stakeholders (ECS), a role-based stakeholder group whose salience derives from coordination capability alongside power, legitimacy, and urgency. The findings highlight the need for policy frameworks that develop and strengthen institutional capacity for coordination, extend ecosystems theory by recognizing coordination as an architectural developmental need, and highlight the importance of design strategies responsive to specific fragmentation patterns in diverse regional contexts. Our study also reveals that work remains concentrated in Asia and Africa, with continued Global North–Global South inequities in authorship and journal visibility. This study offers management and policy insights on digital poverty that may also apply to other complex challenges requiring effective and sustained multi-stakeholder collaboration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ofori et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c5d873532290d020ceehttps://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2025.10117
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital technologies, poverty and microfinance in developing countries2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Challenges in developing information and communication technology ( ICT ) use for rural e‐governance: An ecology perspective2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda2024 · 26 citations
  4. 4A decision support scheme for solving the mobile coverage gap in rural areas in developing countries – Demonstrated with a case in Indonesia2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected?2017 · 153 citations