PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Virchows Archiv0 citationsOpen Access

Vision transformer-based diagnosis of psoriasis and eczema in whole-slide histology

LMLuis Carlos Rivera MonroyAPAnne PetzoldMSMelissa Indah Sari

Key Points

  • To develop a diagnostic framework using vision transformers to differentiate between psoriasis and eczema from histology slides.
  • Developed a computer-assisted diagnostic framework using the Virchow model and multi-instance learning (MIL) on whole-slide images.
  • Evaluated on an internal dataset of 40 images and an external validation cohort of 40 annotated by board-certified dermatopathologists.
  • Compared model performance against baseline convolutional neural networks and other feature extractor methods.
  • Achieved 85% accuracy and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.80 on the external cohort.
  • Outperformed baseline convolutional neural networks, which had a maximum accuracy of 61%.
  • Individual dermatopathologist accuracies ranged from 47.5 to 70.0%, while consensus accuracy was 62.5%.
  • Model generates attention heatmaps to visually support predictions.

Abstract

Abstract Psoriasis and eczema are chronic inflammatory skin diseases with overlapping histopathological features, which often lead to diagnostic uncertainty even among experienced dermatopathologists. To address this challenge, we developed a computer-assisted diagnostic framework that combines the Virchow foundation model, pretrained on 1.5 million whole-slide images, with multi-instance learning (MIL) to classify psoriasis and eczema from digitized histopathology slides. Using an internal dataset ( n = 40) and an external validation cohort ( n = 40), equally balanced between both conditions and annotated by board-certified dermatopathologists, our best-performing configuration (Virchow + CLAM) achieved 85% accuracy, a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.80, and an AUC of 0.81 on the external cohort. This substantially outperformed baseline convolutional neural networks, which reached 61% accuracy, and models relying solely on pretrained feature extractors without MIL, which achieved an average accuracy of 68.8%. In a reader study on the same external cohort, individual dermatopathologist accuracies ranged from 47.5 to 70.0%, with a majority-vote consensus accuracy of 62.5%; our method outperformed both the average individual reader and the consensus under histology-only conditions. Furthermore, the model generates attention heatmaps that provide supportive visual context by highlighting regions associated with model predictions. Importantly, this study is designed as a methodological proof-of-concept conducted under controlled, histology-only conditions and is not intended for direct clinical deployment. Rather than demonstrating clinical readiness, it illustrates the potential of domain-specific foundation models combined with MIL for addressing diagnostically challenging inflammatory dermatoses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Monroy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994cb3873532290d0215ddhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-026-04445-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper