This paper critically examines Charles Taylor’s analysis in A Secular Age, with a focus on the concepts of authenticity, fragilization and cross-pressure. I explore the ethic of authenticity in relation to the ontological instability produced by exclusive humanism and consider how fragilization and cross-pressure reflect the fragmentation of our relation to the spiritual. At the same time, I engage with critical responses to Taylor that challenge his claims about authenticity and question the coherence and universality of fragilization and cross-pressure as social and cultural phenomena. I conclude that Taylor’s account of authenticity is fundamentally ambivalent, as it reproduces the rigid distinction between immanence and transcendence that the ethic of authenticity itself seeks ostensibly to destabilize.
Spyridon Kaltsas (2026) studied this question.