PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026BMC Nutrition0 citationsOpen Access

Adverse events and tolerability of ketogenic diets – a systematic literature analysis

CSCarolin SchopfMAMarc AssmannNWNadja Wolke

Key Points

  • The aim is to systematically review and categorize the adverse events associated with ketogenic diets.
  • Conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Included prospective interventional studies on adverse events of ketogenic diets from 2019 to 2024.
  • Categorized adverse events using CTCAE criteria and analyzed by diet type.
  • 36 studies with 42 ketogenic interventions were evaluated.
  • 43% of participants experienced at least one adverse event, averaging 0.91 adverse events per person.
  • Gastrointestinal complaints (40%) were the most prevalent, followed by neurological (17%) and metabolic/nutritional disorders (12%).
  • Constipation (24%) was the most commonly reported individual adverse event.
  • Stricter diet adherence was linked to a higher rate and severity of adverse events.

Abstract

Abstract Background Ketogenic diets (KDs) are becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of various diseases, not just pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Despite the growing use of this dietary approach and its economic rationale, a systematic overview of the associated adverse events remains conspicuously absent. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in the electronic database PubMed. Prospective interventional studies documenting adverse events associated with ketogenic diets published between 2019 and 2024 were included. The recorded adverse events were categorized according to CTCAE criteria and analyzed based on frequency and diversity by diet type. Results A total of 36 studies involving 42 ketogenic interventions (classic KD, modified Atkins diet, MCT-based KD, LGIT) were evaluated. The included studies covered a wide range of age groups and conditions. At least one adverse event was documented in 43% of the participants (0–89%, 0.91 ± 0.71 adverse events per person). The most prevalent adverse events were gastrointestinal (40%), followed by neurological (17%), and metabolic and nutritional (12%) disorders. Constipation (24%) was the most commonly reported individual adverse event. A higher rate and severity of adverse events was observed in patients following stricter diets. The tolerability of the intervention was influenced by several factors, including age, the presence of underlying diseases, and the duration of the intervention. Conclusions The analysis indicates that adverse events frequently occur alongside KD and encompass a broad spectrum, with gastrointestinal complaints predominating. However, the significance of the findings is limited by the heterogeneity of dietary regimens, the lack of standardization, and the occasional inadequate documentation of adverse events. In clinical practice, it is recommended that adverse events are recorded systematically and monitored regularly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schopf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994d42873532290d021d5dhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-026-01277-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper