PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using a Dermal Allograft Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Aged <70 Years: A Comparative Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

View Full Paper
AJAyham J. JaberMHMarilee P. HoranMHMaximilian Hinz

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for treating irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients.
  • Analyzed data from 69 patients under 70 years who underwent either SCR with dermal allograft or RTSA.
  • Conducted a follow-up of at least 5 years post-surgery.
  • Utilized patient-reported outcome measures like ASES, SANE, and QuickDASH scores to evaluate improvements.
  • Performed Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis to compare outcomes between groups.
  • RTSA showed a higher survival rate of 90.1% compared to 75.0% for SCR after 5 years (P = .018).
  • Only 11 failures in SCR (32.4%) vs. 3 in RTSA (8.6%).
  • Postoperative scores for ASES, SANE, and SF-12 MCS were similar between groups, while QuickDASH and SF-12 PCS favored SCR (P = .009 and P = .016, respectively).
  • Sports participation improved significantly in the SCR group.

Abstract

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is the gold standard surgical procedure for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with acellular dermal allograft (DA) has demonstrated good short-term outcomes in younger patients. Studies that compare the 2 procedures are lacking. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of these 2 surgical techniques at a minimum 5-year follow-up to evaluate their efficacy, durability, and complication profiles. It was hypothesized that RTSA would result in superior outcome scores and higher survival rates. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 69 consecutive patients .05). At follow-up, all PROMs in both treatment groups improved significantly from preoperative values ( P .05). QuickDASH (RTSA, 24.3 ± 19.5; SCR, 11.3 ± 12.0; P = .009) and SF-12 PCS (RTSA, 44.3 ± 12.2; SCR, 52.1 ± 7.8; P = .016) did differ significantly, favoring SCR. Sports participation was moderately below the preinjury level in both groups (RTSA, <25% to 50%–65%; SCR, 25%–49% to 75%–99%) but improved significantly only in the SCR group ( P = .009). Satisfaction was similar in both groups, with a median of 9 (range, 1-10). Conclusion: In treating irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in younger patients, RTSA demonstrated superior survivorship (90.1%) compared with SCR with DA (75.0%) at mid-term follow-up. However, in patients without treatment failure, both RTSA and SCR had equal improvements in most PROMs at ≥5 years of follow-up, with some scores favoring SCR in nonfailure cases. Higher sports participation, PCS, and lower disability were noted in the SCR group.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jaber et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d27482488d673cd2e21https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251403024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper