PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Clinical Apheresis0 citations

The Impact of Lipoprotein Apheresis on Changes in Biochemical Enzymes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
AHAlireza HatamiMEMasoud EslamiSASaeed Aslani

Key Points

  • The study aims to synthesize evidence on the effects of lipoprotein apheresis on circulating biochemical enzyme levels.
  • Conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for observational studies.
  • Included pre- and post-apheresis enzyme values for specific enzymes.
  • Performed pooled analyses of available data from eligible articles.
  • Significant reductions observed in AST, ALP, LDH, and CPK levels after apheresis sessions.
  • No significant changes noted in ALT and GGT levels after treatment.
  • Findings indicate that lipoprotein apheresis does not elevate muscle or liver injury markers.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is an established therapy for severe, drug‐refractory dyslipidemias. Nevertheless, clinicians often monitor hepatic and muscle enzymes during treatment because transient biochemical shifts can be misinterpreted as injury. In this study, we synthesize the evidence on how repeated apheresis sessions affect circulating enzymes. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to August 2025 for observational human studies reporting pre‐ and post‐apheresis values (mean and SD) for aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine phosphokinase (CPK). Effects were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD, IU/L). Of 267 records screened, 9 articles (published 1998–2006) met eligibility for quantitative synthesis, yielding 9 ALT, 8 AST, 7 ALP, 6 GGT, 9 LDH and 6 CPK study estimates. Pooled analyses showed significant decreases in AST (WMD = −0.87; 95% CI: −1.51 to −0.23; p = 0.007), ALP (WMD = −6.28; CI: −11.75to −0.80; p = 0.02), LDH (WMD = −11.12; CI: −17.01 to −5.24; p = 0.001) and CPK (WMD = −6.91; CI: −13.06 to −0.75; p = 0.02). However, levels of ALT (WMD = −0.78; CI: −2.10 to 0.53; p = 0.29) and GGT (WMD = −2.64; CI: −8.71 to 3.44; p = 0.39) were unchanged. Across repeated‐session studies, LA does not elevate hepatic or muscle injury markers and is associated with modest reductions in AST, ALP, LDH, and CPK. These findings support the biochemical safety profile of apheresis and suggest that routine enzyme monitoring should be interpreted in context.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hatami et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d3c482488d673cd30a5https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.70100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper