PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Thermal Science0 citationsOpen Access

Optimization design and performance analysis of a heat recovery and storage system for sports stadiums

XZXiwei ZhongJWJie WangXSXiaojun Shi

Key Points

  • The central aim is to enhance energy efficiency in sports stadiums through optimized heat recovery and storage solutions.
  • Constructed a heat recovery and storage system model using TRNSYS and FLUENT co-simulation.
  • Performed layout optimization for key component selection.
  • Conducted multi-operating-condition simulation analysis.
  • Heat recovery efficiency reaches 75.4%-78.6% under normal conditions and over 79% during events.
  • Daily energy storage fluctuation controlled within 5.8%-8%.
  • Heat pump COP varies from 4.5 at 25°C to 2.3 at -5°C, exceeding rotary heat exchangers by 15%-20%.

Abstract

Sports stadiums, as high-energy-consuming public buildings, face challenges such as high energy consumption and low waste heat utilization. This paper constructs an optimization model for a heat recovery and storage system coupled with the building?s thermal environment. Through key component selection, layout optimization, and multi-operating-condition simulation analysis, the system?s energy-saving performance is improved. A 1:1 stadium model was constructed using the TRNSYS and FLUENT co-simulation platform. Verification results show that the deviation between simulated and measured energy consumption is ?5%, and the temperature deviation is ?1.2?C. Simulation data demonstrates that the system?s heat recovery efficiency reaches 75.4%-78.6% under normal operating conditions, increasing to 79.3%-81.2% under event conditions and remaining above 72.5% under extreme conditions. Daily fluctuations in energy storage are controlled within 5.8%-7.6% under normal operating conditions and approach 8% under extreme conditions. The heat pump COP reaches 4.5 at 25?C, but significantly decreases to 2.3 at -5?C. This efficiency exceeds traditional rotary heat exchangers (?60%) by 15%-20%, demonstrating significant improvement. The research achieved the goals of heat recovery efficiency ?75% and energy storage fluctuation ?8%, providing support for upgrading energy-saving technologies in sports stadiums.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d3c482488d673cd30a8https://doi.org/10.2298/tsci2601021z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper