PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026International Journal of Dentistry0 citationsOpen Access

Comparing Neural Networks and Naive Bayes in the Prediction of Drug Gene Interactions of Type 4 Collagenase for Gingival Epithelialization

View Full Paper
SAShreya AryaDADeepavalli ArumuganainarPYPradeep Kumar Yadalam

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare neural networks and Naive Bayes for predicting drug-gene interactions of type 4 collagenase in gingival epithelialization.
  • Analyzed a dataset of drugs and genes related to type 4 collagenase
  • Applied machine learning algorithms including neural networks and Naive Bayes
  • Conducted data normalization and addressed missing values
  • Employed a neural network with 10 hidden layers and ReLU activation function
  • Naive Bayes achieved an area under the curve of 0.995
  • Naive Bayes showed higher precision, F1 score, and recall compared to neural networks
  • Neural networks struggled with overall accuracy despite higher complexity
  • Naive Bayes exhibited low specificity, leading to potential false-positive rates

Abstract

Objective This study aims to compare the predictive abilities of neural networks and Naive Bayes in forecasting drug–gene interactions of type 4 collagenase in gingival epithelialization. Materials and Methods This study examines drug–gene interactions in type 4 collagen using a dataset encompassing drugs, genes, biochemical activity, mode of action, and molecular activity. Data normalization and handling of missing values are conducted to minimize the influence of larger variables. Machine learning algorithms such as neural networks and Naïve Bayes forecast or categorize drug–gene interactions. The neural network architecture, featuring 10 hidden layers, the ReLU activation function, the Adam optimizer, regularization, and a maximum of 100 iterations, is adept at solving complex problems. Results Naive Bayes demonstrates a high area under the curve of 0.995 and notable classification accuracy (CA), but registers low overall accuracy and F1 score. It outperforms the Neural Network model in accuracy, precision, F1 score, and recall, but exhibits low specificity, potentially leading to elevated false‐positive rates. Conclusion Predictions of drug–gene interactions for type 4 collagen hold promise for understanding biological pathways, identifying drug targets, designing targeted therapies, understanding disease mechanisms, and facilitating personalized medicine. The predictive models employed provide potential applications in personalized medicine, facilitating targeted therapies and disease management strategies. By elucidating biological pathways and drug targets, this research holds promise for advancing clinical interventions and improving patient outcomes in oral health care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d50482488d673cd3137https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/7501904
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper