PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry0 citationsOpen Access

Life events and their subjective appraisal by children and adolescents in clinical high-risk states of psychosis: a cross-sectional comparison with inpatients with non-psychotic disorders and community subjects

CKCelina KullmannCMChantal MichelPWP. Walger

Key Points

  • This research examines how children at clinical high risk for psychosis appraise life events compared to those with non-psychotic disorders and community subjects.
  • Cross-sectional analysis of life events using the Munich Life Event Scale.
  • Participants included children and adolescents aged 8-17 years in three groups: clinical high-risk, non-psychotic inpatients, and healthy controls.
  • Comparison of subjective appraisals of life events and negative symptoms across groups.
  • Life events, especially interpersonal ones, were more frequent in the clinical high-risk group compared to healthy controls.
  • No significant differences in appraisal of life events across groups were found.
  • An increase in life events correlated with higher negative symptoms but did not show significant stress sensitization effects.

Abstract

Abstract While childhood trauma and neglect are generally found to be increased in clinical high-risk of psychosis (CHR-P), findings on life events (LEs) are so far inconclusive, with some indication of a stress sensitization effect in CHR-P, leading to generally higher stress appraisals of LEs, and a LE-reducing effect of negative symptoms. Thus, we studied 50 LEs and their appraisals as assessed with the Munich Life Event Scale in CHR-P patients according to ultra-high risk and basic symptom criteria and age- and sex-matched clinical inpatient (ClinS) and healthy controls (GPS; each n = 112, age 8–17 yrs., 57.1% female). LEs, particularly those of interpersonal nature, were increased in CHR-P compared to GPS but not ClinS, and their number and presence was positively related to subjective negative symptoms. Furthermore, appraisals rarely and only unsystematically differed between groups but correlated significantly in most cases with a more negative appraisal being related to a higher stress appraisal. Thus, there was no indication of a significant stress sensitization effect in CHR-P. Rather, the increased number of LEs, in particular interpersonal ones, likely increases the overall load of stress in terms of a stress accumulation and decreases the size of the supportive social network as well as increases negative symptoms. Thus, early interventions in CHR-P should also include improving strategies to deal with LEs, particularly those of interpersonal nature, to improve resilience and reduce burden of non-normative LEs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kullmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d65482488d673cd33c0https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02949-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Life events and their subjective appraisal by children and adolescents in clinical high-risk states of psychosis: a cross-sectional comparison with inpatients with non-psychotic disorders and community subjects.2026
  2. 2Negative life events and emotional symptoms from ages 2 to 30 years2024
  3. 3Stressful life events and their association with symptom severity and functioning in first-episode psychosis2026
  4. 4Relationships between psychotic and affective symptoms, schizotypal and dissociative phenomena, and adverse life events among individuals with psychotic disorders2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Assessment of the relationship between psychotic-like experiences and traumatic life events: a cross-sectional study2024