PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth0 citations

Stress and Deformation Characteristics of the Central‐Southern Tibetan Crust: Insights From Electrical Anisotropy Studies

View Full Paper
ZLZhehan LiuHDHao DongSJSheng Jin

Key Points

  • This study investigates the relationship between stress and deformation in the Tibetan Plateau's crust using electrical anisotropy.
  • Conducted electrical anisotropic studies along a profile in the central-southern Tibetan Plateau.
  • Developed resistivity models to analyze conductive layers in the crust and upper mantle.
  • Estimated melt fraction and viscosity distribution using empirical formulations from experiments.
  • Identified a large-scale conductive layer beneath the Tibetan Plateau.
  • Revealed distinct electrical anisotropy orientations: N–S in the middle crust and E–W in the lower crust.
  • Showed the alignment of fractures and melt pockets influences effective conductivity.

Abstract

Abstract Mechanisms governing the stress‐induced surface deformation of the Tibetan Plateau and other continental collision zones remain vigorously debated in the geoscience community. Crustal rheological properties can offer valuable insights into the Earth's deformation patterns. Here, we present an electrical anisotropic study of the crust and upper mantle along a profile in the central‐southern Tibetan Plateau. Our resistivity models unveil a large‐scale conductive layer beneath the study region, with distinct electric anisotropic orientations within the middle and lower crust. The middle crust exhibits nearly north–south (N–S) directed anisotropy features, whereas the lower crust anisotropy axis is east–west (E–W) directed. From the conductivity model, we estimate the melt fraction and viscosity distribution using an experiment‐based empirical formulation. As demonstrated by the petrological experiments, the amphibole‐rich mid‐to‐lower crust could host the aligned fractures/microcracks and melt pockets, possibly facilitating the observed anisotropy. With an anisotropic conduction model, we also show that the distribution characteristics of these cracks and pockets may directly influence the effective conductivity. The two‐layered electrical anisotropy observed likely reflects distinct deformation types and rheological strengths: the N–S electrical anisotropy may originate from fluid‐filled fractures from the brittle deformation in the middle, while the E–W anisotropy may arise from the deformed conductive melt pockets in the ductile lower crust. These findings may provide a novel way to characterize the crustal deformation mechanisms using geo‐electrical anisotropy, in other tectonically active regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d65482488d673cd34a9https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030594
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper