PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders0 citations

Preliminary Testing of Recognize. Relax. Record.: A Tier 2 Intervention for Elementary Students With Internalizing Behaviors

View Full Paper
MBMark Matthew BuckmanKLKathleen Lynne LaneWOWendy Peia Oakes

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the RRR intervention for elementary students exhibiting internalizing behaviors.
  • Utilized a multiple-baseline design across participants with five elementary students.
  • Assessed student engagement during academic instruction before and after RRR implementation.
  • Collected treatment integrity data to ensure implementation fidelity.
  • Gathered social validity ratings from participants and adults regarding the intervention's acceptability.
  • Modest evidence indicated a positive functional relation between RRR instruction and student engagement.
  • Shifts in engagement were small in magnitude and required further investigation for generalization.
  • High treatment integrity was observed across the intervention's implementation.
  • Positive social validity ratings were reported, although variability existed among students.

Abstract

This article features two studies examining the impact of a Tier 2 intervention—Recognize. Relax. Record. (RRR)—designed to support elementary students with internalizing behaviors by helping them manage anxious feelings and increase academic engagement. We collaborated with teachers to use screening and attendance data to locate students who might benefit from RRR. Results of a multiple-baseline design across participants study with five students provided modest evidence of a functional relation between introduction of RRR Instruction and decreases in variability of students’ engagement during academic instruction. These shifts were mostly small in magnitude and in need of replication and future inquiry before generalizing results. Treatment integrity data suggested high levels of implementation fidelity. Overall, social validity ratings were positive for most participants; however, some variability in ratings across students—as well as differences in adults’ pre- to post-intervention ratings—suggested the intervention was more acceptable for supporting some students than others. Results of an A–B nonexperimental study provided descriptive data suggesting potential benefits of implementing RRR instruction in a small-group format. We discuss the findings of this initial test of RRR, noting limitations and directions for future inquiry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buckman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d7a482488d673cd3561https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266261417641
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper