PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Insects1 citationsOpen Access

The Impact of Energy and Protein Levels on Yellow Mealworm Growth and Chemical Composition

View Full Paper
MVMarko VukadinovićMIMirko IvkovićDBDejan Beuković

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how varying energy and protein levels in diets affect yellow mealworm growth and chemical makeup.
  • Utilized nine different insect diets based on wheat bran, corn, and soybean meal.
  • Measured weight gain of larvae in grams per day per tray over various diets.
  • Analyzed feed conversion efficiency and chemical composition of the insects.
  • Weight gain ranged from 0.57 g/day for low-energy low-protein diets to 0.71 g/day for high-protein medium-energy diets.
  • Feed conversion ratios varied from 1.83 to 2.34, significantly influenced by protein and energy levels.
  • Fat content ranged from 38.5% in low-protein diets to 26.9% in high-protein diets, indicating significant differences in chemical composition.

Abstract

To maximize protein production from insects, it is essential to understand their nutritional requirements, production characteristics, and the chemical properties of the resulting feed, along with how these factors depend on the insects’ diets. This research involved the use of nine different insect diets, all based on wheat bran. Corn and soybean meal were included to enhance the energy and protein content. The weight gain of larvae was significantly affected by the level of protein in their feed; however, the energy level did not have a significant impact on the weight gain measured in grams per day per tray. This gain ranged from 0.57 g/day per tray for insects fed low-energy, low-protein diets to 0.71 g/day per tray for those fed high-protein, medium-energy diets. Feed conversion ranged from 1.83 to 2.34 and was significantly influenced by energy and protein levels. The chemical composition of reared insects showed significant differences, particularly in fat content. The fat content ranged from 38.5% with a low-protein diet to just 26.9% with a high-protein diet. In contrast to fat content, the variability in protein content was smaller, ranging from 44.8% in a low-protein, high-energy diet to 51.9% in a high-protein, high-energy diet.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vukadinović et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d8e482488d673cd36f8https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17020221
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improving Tenebrio molitor Growth and Nutritional Value through Vegetable Waste Supplementation2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2The house cricket (Acheta domesticus) as a novel food: a risk profile2019 · 111 citations
  3. 3Edible insects as an alternative protein source: Nutritional composition and global consumption patterns2025 · 32 citations
  4. 4An Introduction to Traditional and Novel Alternative Proteins for Low- and Middle-Income Countries2023 · 11 citations
  5. 5Edible Insects and Sustainable Development Goals2021 · 125 citations