PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Age and Ageing0 citations

The impact of primary health care services, continuity of care and patterns of care on mortality and hospitalisation-related outcomes in residents of long-term care facilities: a comprehensive national evaluation

View Full Paper
MIMaria C. InacioJSJohannes SchwabeMCMaria Crotty

Key Points

  • This study explores how primary health care services, care continuity, and care patterns affect mortality and hospitalisation outcomes in long-term care.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study of 358,354 residents in 2,948 facilities across Australia.
  • Examined primary care service utilization, GP continuity, and various care patterns.
  • Investigated one-year risks of all-cause and premature mortality along with nine hospitalisation measures.
  • Utilized propensity-score adjusted survival models for analysis.
  • Residents with high preventive health services had lower mortality risks (HR = 0.91).
  • Continuity of care with usual GP decreased risks for emergency visits and unplanned hospitalisations.
  • Specific healthcare services, including nurse practitioner and medication reviews, were linked to lower premature mortality.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction High-quality evidence on the benefits of primary care in long-term care (LTC) is lacking. This study investigated the effect of primary health care services, continuity of care and care patterns on the risk of mortality and hospitalisation-related outcomes in LTC facility residents. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 358 354 residents of 2948 LTC facilities across Australia was conducted (1 January 2013–31 December 2019). Primary care services, general practitioner (GP) continuity of care, and care patterns were examined. One-year risk of all-cause/premature mortality and nine hospitalisation measures were investigated. Propensity-score–adjusted survival models were employed. Results Residents with a care pattern inclusive of high preventive health services utilisation and low urgent after-hours attendances had lower risks of mortality vs. high overall use, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.88–0.94; vs. high reactive use, HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.88–0.94 and most outcomes examined e.g. fractures, subdistribution hazard ratio (sHRs) range = 0.90–0.91, 95% CI range = 0.84–0.97 compared to those with other care patterns. Residents who continued to see their usual GP had a lower risk of emergency department presentations (sHR = 0.92, 95% CI= 0.90–0.94), unplanned hospitalisations (sHR = 0.94, 95% CI= 0.92–0.96), falls (sHR = 0.89, 95% CI= 0.86–0.92), malnutrition (sHR = 0.88, 95% CI= 0.82–0.96), and dementia/delirium hospitalisations (sHR = 0.79, 95% CI= 0.72–0.87) than those who did not. Nurse practitioner attendances, optometrical services, comprehensive medication reviews, health assessments, management plans and podiatry attendances on their own were associated with lower premature mortality and some hospitalisation-related outcomes. Conclusions Care patterns focusing on prevention and disease management, GP continuity of care and certain primary care services can positively impact residents’ health and outcomes in LTC facilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Inacio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e00482488d673cd4495https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afag026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper