PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Investigating photometric and spectroscopic variability in the multiply imaged little red dot A2744-QSO1

View Full Paper
LFLukas J. FurtakASAmy R. SecundaJGJenny E. Greene

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the variability in photometric and spectroscopic features of A2744-QSO1 to confirm its classification as an AGN.
  • Utilized observations from JWST to analyze A2744-QSO1 and its multiple images due to gravitational lensing.
  • Measured equivalent widths of broad Hα and Hβ lines to assess variability over a period of 875 days.
  • Compared findings with a damped random walk variability model applicable to AGN.
  • Significant variations observed in equivalent widths: 18 ± 3% for Hα and 22 ± 8% for Hβ over the evaluated timescale.
  • No significant photometric variability detected beyond systematic uncertainties.
  • Findings support A2744-QSO1's classification as an active galactic nucleus.

Abstract

JWST observations have uncovered a new population of red, compact objects at high redshifts dubbed “little red dots” (LRDs), which typically show broad emission lines and are thought to be dusty active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Some of their other features, however, challenge the AGN explanation, such as prominent Balmer breaks and extremely faint or even missing metal high-ionization lines, X-ray, or radio emission, including in deep stacks. Time variability is another robust test of AGN activity. Here, we exploit the z = 7. 045 multiply imaged LRD A2744-QSO1, which offers a particularly unique test of variability due to lensing-induced time delays between the three images spanning 22 yr (2. 7 yr in the rest-frame), to investigate its photometric and spectroscopic variability. We find the equivalent widths (EWs) of the broad Hα and Hβ lines, which are independent of magnification and other systematics, to exhibit significant variations, of up to 18 ± 3% for Hα and up to 22 ± 8% in Hβ, on a timescale of 875 d (2. 4 yr) in the rest-frame. This suggests that A2744-QSO1 is indeed an AGN. We find no significant photometric variability beyond the limiting systematic uncertainties, so it currently cannot be determined whether the EW variations are due to line-flux or continuum variability. These results are consistent with a typical damped random walk variability model for an AGN such as A2744-QSO1 (M₁₇ = 4 × 10^7 M⊙) given the sparse sampling of the light curve with the available data. Our results therefore support the AGN interpretation of this LRD, and highlight the need for further photometric and spectroscopic monitoring in order to build a detailed and reliable light curve.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Furtak et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e00482488d673cd4667https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper