PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation0 citations

Empowering Independence in Spina Bifida: A Scoping Review of Interventions

View Full Paper
CWCamille WilsonLBLauren E. BradstreetNLNatasha N. Ludwig

Key Points

  • This review aims to identify and analyze studies on interventions that promote independence readiness for individuals with spina bifida.
  • Conducted a scoping review using PRISMA-ScR guidelines from 2000 to 2024
  • Screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of articles by author dyads
  • Performed data extraction in duplicate for accuracy
  • Analyzed 38 studies after applying inclusion criteria
  • Only 5 of the 38 studies used a rigorous randomized control trial design
  • Gaps identified in interventions related to decision-making and sexual health
  • Most interventions were focused on school-age youth to older adults
  • Outcomes measurement varied widely, suggesting a need for standardization

Abstract

Objectives: To examine intervention studies focused on developing independence readiness skills in individuals with spina bifida. Methods: The scoping review used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to identify intervention studies published from 2000 to 2024. Articles were included if they were an intervention study focused on preidentified domains of independence based on the Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida by the Spina Bifida Association. Title and abstract screening and full-text articles were completed by author dyads. Data extraction was completed in duplicate to ensure accuracy by separate raters. Inconsistencies were resolved through group consensus and item review. Results: From 2542 unique references, 2028 were removed for not meeting inclusion criteria. Following full-text review, 38 studies were included in the final analysis. Only 5 studies utilized a rigorous randomized control trial study design. Intervention gaps targeting supported decision-making models and sexual health were noted. Interventions generally targeted school-age youth to older adults, with no studies focused on interventions for early childhood populations. Outcomes measurement varied widely across studies; future research will benefit from standardization of tools used to measure outcomes of interest. Conclusion: Intervention studies focused on increasing independence skills for individuals with spina bifida are limited. For this growing area of research, comprehensive representation of understudied and underrepresented individuals within the spina bifida community, consideration of shared data elements across studies, and alignment of targeted domains of independence with stakeholder input must be central to future research efforts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e00482488d673cd4668https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00046
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision2020 · 157 citations
  2. 2The Association Between Race/Ethnicity and Major Birth Defects in the United States, 1999–20072014 · 141 citations
  3. 3Use of the Anal Plug in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Patients With Meningomyelocele2008 · 12 citations
  4. 4Self-care independence in children with neurological disorders: An interactional model of adaptive demands and executive dysfunction.2007 · 51 citations
  5. 5A randomized trial of teen online problem solving: Efficacy in improving caregiver outcomes after brain injury.2012 · 99 citations