PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of the American Geriatrics Society0 citations

Quality of Care Indicators for People With Dementia: An Umbrella Review

View Full Paper
SSSebastián Soto‐GuerreroCOCamilo Oñate‐SchneiderJLJaviera Leniz

Key Points

  • The aim is to summarize and evaluate quality indicators (QIs) for dementia care across the disease trajectory.
  • Conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews on dementia care QIs.
  • Performed a structured search across multiple databases like MEDLINE and Cochrane Library.
  • Extracted and categorized QIs based on their stage of care and type of indicator.
  • Evaluated methodological quality of reviews using AMSTAR 2 and AIRE tools.
  • Identified 554 QIs from six reviews, synthesized into 120 distinct QIs.
  • 72% classified as process indicators, 16% as structure, and 12% as outcome indicators.
  • 27% of QIs recommended solely for community settings, while 67% applicable in multiple settings.
  • Advanced care planning and individual healthcare plans were the most cited QIs.
  • Overall quality of systematic reviews was low to critically low, but over a third of QIs had high methodological quality.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Monitoring the dementia care quality is key for healthcare services. Dementia care quality indicators (QIs) have been reported in the literature, fragmented by setting or stage of care. We aimed to conduct an umbrella review (review of systematic reviews) to identify, evaluate, and summarize dementia care QIs throughout the disease trajectory. Methods We conducted an umbrella review reporting the development, review, or testing of dementia care QIs. We used a structured search in MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, and LILACS. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full‐texts. QIs from included articles were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second one. The AMSTAR 2 and AIRE tools were used to assess the methodological quality of reviews and QIs, respectively. Included QIs were categorized and coded based on their stage of care (initial assessment after diagnosis, follow‐up and treatment, and end‐of‐life), type of indicator (structure, process, outcome), and specific aspects of care measured. Results Six systematic reviews were included, comprising 554 dementia care QIs that were synthesized into 120 QIs. 86 (72%) were classified as process, 20 (16%) as structure, and 14 (12%) as outcome indicators. 32 QIs (27%) are recommended exclusively for community settings, 7 (6%) for hospital settings, and 81 (67%) for more than one care setting. The 120 QIs are related to 60 different aspects of care, with advanced care planning and having an individualized healthcare plan being the most frequently quoted QIs. The quality of systematic reviews was low to critically low, and over a third of QIs were considered to have high methodological quality. Conclusions Our umbrella review synthesized a broad overview of dementia care QIs, facilitating healthcare organizations to monitor and improve areas in need. Future research should focus on validating these QIs in local contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soto‐Guerrero et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e0e482488d673cd472ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper