PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching0 citationsOpen Access

Skateboarding's Olympic debut: A comparative analysis describing the men's and women's street competition

View Full Paper
SDShelley DiewaldNMNick D. ManciniNNNiklas Noth

Key Points

  • The aim was to compare performance aspects in the men's and women's street skateboarding competitions during the Tokyo 2020 Olympics.
  • Analyzed trick attempts from broadcast footage of skateboarding competitions.
  • Used descriptive analyses to characterize performance measures.
  • Employed robust linear mixed-effects models to compare scores between men's and women's divisions.
  • Men's scores were significantly higher and more variable in both run and best-trick attempts.
  • Men attempted more unique tricks (122 vs. 74) and demonstrated greater variety in take-off and landing stances.
  • Women showed wider course use during best-trick attempts but less obstacle variation compared to men.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe aspects of performance in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic street skateboarding competition and compare the men's (M) and women's (W) divisions. Trick attempts (TA = 1118) were extracted from broadcast footage of the semi-finals and finals using notational analysis. Descriptive analyses were adopted to characterise performance, with robust linear mixed-effects models comparing attempt scores (run RUN and best-trick BT) between divisions. Men's RUN (β = 1.71 1.43, 1.99) and BT (β = 1.85 1.55, 2.15) scores were higher and more variable than the women. Overall, there was more trick variety during BTs, but less obstacle variability compared to RUNs. Skaters bailed a greater proportion of BT TAs (54.6%) than RUN TAs (14.3%). Men demonstrated greater variety than women by diversifying take-off (M = 28.2% vs. W = 3.3% non-regular) and landing (M = 25.7% vs. W = 6.2% non-regular) stances, attempting more unique tricks (M = 122 vs. W = 74), and using larger feature obstacles (M = 40.7% vs. W = 33.9% of TAs). Alternatively, women demonstrated wider course use during BTs (M = 15% vs. W = 32.1% of all obstacles), corresponding to less feature obstacle use; perhaps indicating a barrier to engagement due to developing physical qualities. Future research should explore men's and women's divisions respectively to understand key factors for success.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diewald et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e20482488d673cd49a4https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261420351
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Professionalization of action sports: field- and organizational-level professionalization of new Olympic sports2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Skating into the Unknown: Scoping the Physical, Technical, and Tactical Demands of Competitive Skateboarding2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme42015 · 88,447 citations
  4. 4Welcome to the Tidyverse2019 · 22,706 citations
  5. 5The implementation of performance analysis and feedback within Olympic sport: The performance analyst's perspective2018 · 25 citations