PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026European journal of medical research0 citationsOpen Access

Oral 5‑aminolevulinic acid for overactive bladder: a double‑blind, randomized, placebo‑controlled pilot trial

SFSatoshi FukataNSNobutaka ShimizuTKTakahira Kuno

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral 5-ALA in participants with overactive bladder (OAB).
  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design.
  • Participants received either 150 mg of oral 5-ALA phosphate or a placebo for 12 weeks.
  • Changes in OAB symptoms were assessed using the OAB symptom score and questionnaire.
  • Safety evaluations included blood pressure monitoring and adverse event reporting.
  • 49 participants were enrolled and randomized to 5-ALA (23) and placebo (26) groups.
  • At week 12, the OAB symptom score decreased in both groups but not significantly different between them.
  • The adjusted between-group difference in OAB symptom score change was negligible, indicating no significant improvement.

Abstract

Abstract Background 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) reportedly improves overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms by reducing reactive oxygen species derived from vascular endothelial cells to protect vascular function and enhance bladder blood flow and by inhibiting bladder C-fiber activity. This double-blind, randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-ALA in participants with OAB. Methods This randomized, prospective study classified the participants into the 5-ALA and placebo groups. The 5-ALA group received oral 5-ALA phosphate at 150 mg/day for 12 weeks. The efficacy of 5-ALA was determined by assessing the changes in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form from baseline to weeks 4 and 12 after treatment initiation, as well as the post-void residual urine volume. Regarding safety, we evaluated participants’ blood pressure and adverse events. Results This study enrolled and randomized 49 participants, with 23 in the 5-ALA group and 26 in the placebo group. Ultimately, 47 participants completed the study (21 and 26 in the 5-ALA and placebo groups, respectively). From baseline to week 12, OABSS significantly decreased from 8.81 to 6.52 (− 2.29) in the 5-ALA group and from 8.54 to 6.35 (− 2.35) in the placebo group (both: p = 0.008). However, no significant difference was noted between the two groups at week 12 ( p = 0.956). Using a mixed model for repeated measures with a random intercept, the model-adjusted between-group difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in the OABSS between the 5-ALA and placebo groups was 0.06 points (95% confidence interval, − 1.63 to 1.75; p = 0.944). Conclusions This study found no significant improvement in OAB symptoms with 5-ALA administration. Nevertheless, given that no previous double-blind, randomized controlled trial has assessed 5-ALA’s efficacy in patients with OAB, this study holds important value as a pilot study. Trial registration This study was prospectively registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT); registration number: jRCTs061220050; registration date: August 29, 2022.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fukata et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e20482488d673cd49e9https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04113-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper