PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Current Orthopaedic Practice0 citations

History of metal allergy in cervical and lumbar arthroplasty: A review

View Full Paper
RSRohan I. SureshHPHershil PatelBGBradley W. Gelfand

Key Points

  • The review aims to assess the impact and implications of metal allergy in cervical and lumbar total disc replacement procedures.
  • Review of existing literature and case reports regarding metal allergies in arthroplasty.
  • Evaluation of diagnostic approaches including patch testing.
  • Analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with documented metal allergy.
  • Metal allergy is associated with chronic inflammation and implant failure.
  • Symptom recurrence and inflammatory masses were noted in reported cases.
  • Alternative materials like ceramics and PEEK could reduce the allergy risk.

Abstract

Cervical and lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative to spinal fusion, offering favorable outcomes and reduced adjacent segment disease. However, the use of metal-on-metal implants introduces the rare but clinically significant risk of metal hypersensitivity. This review examines the pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and treatment considerations surrounding metal allergy in spinal arthroplasty. Metal ions released through implant wear may act as haptens, triggering immune responses, most commonly type IV delayed hypersensitivity, leading to chronic inflammation, soft tissue masses, and implant failure. While metal allergy is well documented in hip and knee arthroplasty, its role in spinal TDR remains underrecognized, with current literature limited to isolated case reports. These reports consistently describe symptom recurrence, sterile inflammatory masses, and histologic findings rich in lymphocytes and eosinophils, often requiring revision surgery and hardware removal. Patch testing is the preferred diagnostic method in patients with a suspected reaction, though its routine use preoperatively is not recommended unless a known history of metal allergy exists. All documented cases in cervical and lumbar TDR were ultimately managed with explanation and fusion, resulting in symptom resolution. Given the increasing prevalence of disc arthroplasty and the estimated 10–15% of the population with metal sensitivity, awareness of this complication is essential. Emerging evidence supports the potential of alternative implant materials such as ceramics and PEEK to mitigate this risk. Further research is warranted to establish incidence rates, optimize screening strategies, and develop hypersensitivity-resistant biomaterials for spinal arthroplasty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suresh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9e9f482488d673cd4c55https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Delayed Hyper-Reactivity to Metal Ions After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty2009 · 113 citations
  2. 2Total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion2018 · 153 citations
  3. 3Clinical Outcomes of Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease2017 · 29 citations
  4. 4Metal Hypersensitivity and Total Knee Arthroplasty2016 · 100 citations
  5. 5Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after cervical disc replacement: A case report2015 · 6 citations