PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2026Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate (STEP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative analysis of patients with large (80–150cc) and very large (>150cc) prostate volumes

View Full Paper
SYSalim K. YounisNSNicolas SoputroAPAdriana Pedraza

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to compare perioperative and functional outcomes of STEP between patients with large and very large prostate volumes.
  • Retrospective review of 183 patients undergoing STEP with the da Vinci Single-Port system.
  • Stratified patients based on prostate volume into large (80-150 cc) and very large (>150 cc) cohorts.
  • Enucleation efficiency was calculated and outcomes compared using descriptive statistics.
  • 179 patients were included (93 LP, 86 VLP); median prostate volume was higher in VLP (194 vs. 117 cc).
  • VLP had higher PSA levels (9.7 vs. 6.75 ng/mL) and longer enucleation times (84 vs. 69 min).
  • Both groups showed equivalent improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Single-Port Transvesical Enucleation of the Prostate (STEP) is a minimally invasive robotic technique for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), particularly in prostates ≧ 80 cc. However, its outcomes in very large prostates (>150 cc) remain under-characterized. We compared perioperative and functional outcomes of STEP between large (LP: 80–150 cc) and very large prostates (VLP: >150 cc). Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 183 patients who underwent STEP using the da Vinci Single-Port system (2019–2024). Patients were stratified into LP and VLP cohorts based on prostate volume (PV). Enucleation efficiency was defined as enucleated tissue weight divided by enucleation time (g/min). Outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 179 patients were included (LP: 93; VLP: 86). Median PV was significantly greater in the VLP group (194 vs. 117 cc, p < 0.001). VLP patients had higher PSA (9.7 vs. 6.75 ng/mL, p = 0.002), longer enucleation (84 vs. 69 min, p = 0.002) and console times (115 vs. 98 min, p = 0.010), and improved enucleation efficiency (1.23 vs. 0.97 g/min, p = 0.025). Estimated blood loss was slightly higher in VLP (100 vs. 80 mL, p = 0.026). All procedures were completed without conversion or additional ports. Hospital stay, catheter duration, and same-day discharge rates were comparable. At 3 months, both groups had equivalent improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (3 vs. 3, p = 0.913), quality-of-life scores (0 vs. 1, p = 0.965), and maximum flow rate (17.5 vs. 16 mL/s, p = 0.594). Complications were rare, with no readmissions and only two major postoperative events. Urinary continence was preserved in all patients, with transient incontinence occurring in 6 patients (LP: 2; VLP: 4), resolving completely by 3 months. Conclusions STEP is effective and scalable for prostates ≥ 80 cc, demonstrating improved enucleation efficiency in very large glands without compromising safety, recovery, or continence preservation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Younis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ba09872792ae9fd8707e4https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01074-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper