PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Vox Sanguinis0 citationsOpen Access

Transforming transfusion safety: Insights from implementing bedside electronic checks at a large UK National Health Service trust

View Full Paper
FOFlorence OyekanMAMontasir AhmedCBCatherine Booth

Key Points

  • The aim is to report on the implementation of bedside electronic transfusion checks (BETC) and insights gained.
  • Three-phase implementation: pre-pilot, pilot, and main implementation (2022–2025)
  • Staff surveys assessed training satisfaction and key performance indicators (KPIs)
  • Statistical process control (SPC) charts analyzed data trends post-implementation
  • 5079 staff were trained and 404 PDA devices were deployed across four hospitals
  • Training 80% of staff led to better uptake compared to the initial 60%
  • Usage of BETC for G&S labelling increased, correlating with reduced sample rejection rates
  • 99.5% of staff rated the training satisfaction positively

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Bedside electronic transfusion checks (BETC) enhance transfusion safety by reducing errors associated with manual processes. Despite national recommendations, BETC adoption in the United Kingdom remains limited. This study reports on the implementation of BETC at four hospitals at Barts Health NHS Trust, aiming to share insights on the implementation process. Materials and Methods The main implementation was split into three phases: (1) pre‐pilot, (2) pilot and (3) main implementation (2022–2025). Staff surveys on training satisfaction and key performance indicators (KPIs) on transfusion activity were used to evaluate the uptake of the BETC system. Statistical process control (SPC) charts were used to identify trends, variation and patterns in the data following the implementation of BETC. Results A total of 5079 staff were trained and 404 personal digital assistant (PDA) devices deployed across four hospitals. Early implementation highlighted that training 60% of staff was insufficient for optimal system use, increasing this threshold to 80% improved adoption. BETC was initially more commonly used for blood administration than group and screen (G&S) sample labelling. Over time, increased usage of BETC for G&S labelling correlated with a marked reduction in sample rejection rates across all sites. Staff reported high satisfaction with training, with 99.5% rating it positively. Conclusion Early adopters played a pivotal role, but achieving widespread adoption required extended training and support. Addressing technical and workflow barriers, coupled with mandatory system use, could enhance the speed of impact of BETC. These insights offer guidance for future adopters aiming to improve transfusion safety and efficiency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oyekan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fb3de8e28729cf64585https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70189
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper