PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Mission-Driven UAV Path Selection: Post Hoc Cost Evaluation of Deterministic and Sampling Approaches

View Full Paper
JKJames R. KellyUCUmair B. Chaudhry

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the effectiveness of various UAV path planning algorithms based on mission-specific criteria.
  • Integrated evaluation framework combining deterministic and sampling-based planners
  • Utilization of a global cost function for post hoc analysis
  • Experiments conducted on an Apple M2 CPU
  • Paths assessed in multiple environments
  • CARRT* demonstrated the lowest costs for fuel and time-sensitive missions
  • Deterministic planners excelled in safety and reward-oriented missions
  • Findings highlight the importance of aligning planner choice with mission objectives

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly deployed in hazardous and dynamic environments, where path planning requires balancing competing objectives beyond simple distance minimisation. Classical planners such as Dijkstra, A*, and RRT* generate paths efficiently but often overlook mission-specific trade-offs involving energy use, risk avoidance, and reward maximisation. This work proposes a unified evaluation framework that integrates grid-based (Dijkstra, A*, weighted A*) and sampling-based (RRT, CARRT*) planners within parameterised environments embedding a range of functions into penalty and reward zones. A global cost function, J = αL + βE + γp− δR, is applied post hoc to decouple path generation from mission prioritisation, enabling rapid reassessment under changing objectives such as low-fuel, high-safety, or speed-priority scenarios. Experiments conducted on an Apple M2 CPU, repeated three times per configuration to ensure statistical robustness, demonstrate that CARRT* achieves the lowest mission costs and highest efficiency for fuel- and time-sensitive missions, while deterministic grid-based planners perform better in safety- and reward-oriented contexts in four environments. These findings indicate that optimal UAV path planning depends not only on algorithmic efficiency but also on aligning planner choice with mission priorities. The framework provides a reproducible methodology for benchmarking and deploying mission-aware path planning strategies in research and operational settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kelly et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fb3de8e28729cf645a8https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10020152
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Survey of Risk-Calibrated Certifiably Safe and Resource-Aware (RCSR) Path Planning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles2026
  2. 2Comparative Evaluation of Classical, Hybrid, and RL-Based 3D Trajectory Planning for Multi-UAV Systems2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Metaheuristic optimization of UAV trajectories for data collection in mission-critical IoT and WSN applications2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Hierarchical path planning for low-altitude logistics UAVs in complex urban environments: an enhanced weighted A* approach with geometric smoothing2026
  5. 5Research, Analysis, and Improvement of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning Algorithms in Urban Ultra-Low Altitude Airspace2024 · 3 citations