PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Hook Angle and Length on Flow Dynamics in Hooked-Head Spur Dikes: A Numerical Study

View Full Paper
CNCongyi NingLLLin LiYQYuhao Qian

Key Points

  • This study investigates how different hook angles and lengths affect flow dynamics in hooked-head spur dikes.
  • Developed a three-dimensional numerical model using the RNG k-ε turbulence closure and VOF method.
  • Simulated nine cases varying hook angle (90°, 120°, 150°) and hook-length ratio (L/D = 1/2, 1/3, 1/4).
  • Analyzed distributions of mainstream velocity and turbulent kinetic energy in the flow structure.
  • A hook angle of 120° achieves a 4.26% increase in dimensionless mainstream velocity compared to 90°.
  • At L/D = 1/2 with a 120° angle, the mainstream velocity increases by 10.58% and 14.64% compared to L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively.
  • Mean dimensionless turbulent kinetic energy decreases as hook angle or length increases, with a 90° angle showing E* 8.80% and 10.65% higher than 120° and 150° angles.

Abstract

Hooked-head spur dikes are a specialized type of spur dike, where their geometry significantly influences flow diversion, sediment transport, and bank protection. This study establishes a three-dimensional numerical model utilizing the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence closure and the volume of fluid (VOF) method to explore the effects of hook angle (90°, 120°, and 150°) and hook-length ratio (L/D = 1/2, 1/3, and 1/4) on the flow structure surrounding a hooked-head spur dike. The study comprises nine simulation cases, and the distributions of mainstream velocity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are analyzed. The results demonstrate that a hook angle of 120° yields the greatest increase in the mean dimensionless mainstream velocity (V*), corresponding to enhancements of 4.26% and 9.09% relative to the angles of 90° and 150°, respectively. When the hook angle is fixed at 120°, increasing the hook length enhances the mainstream velocity; specifically, at L/D = 1/2, the mean V* increases by 10.58% and 14.64% compared to at L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively. Meanwhile, the TKE in the downstream recirculation zone decreases as either the hook angle or the hook length increases. At a hook angle of 90°, the mean dimensionless TKE (E*) is 8.80% and 10.65% higher than at 120° and 150°, respectively. For a fixed hook angle of 120°, the mean E* at L/D = 1/2 decreases by 3.46% and 9.35% compared to at L/D = 1/3 and 1/4, respectively. In summary, the appropriate selection of hook angle and hook length can effectively guide flow toward the channel center, increase conveyance capacity, and enhance hydraulic performance for river regulation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ning et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fc8de8e28729cf6472ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/w18040522
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper