PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Peri-Implant Bone Density Using Intraoral Periapical Radiographs: A Retrospective Observational Clinical Study

View Full Paper
SLSaturnino Marco LupiEGEdoardo GianniniVPViviana Maria Petrantoni

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate peri-implant radiographic bone density as an indicator of osseointegration in dental implants.
  • Retrospective observational clinical study design.
  • Included patients with at least one endosseous dental implant and two standardized periapical radiographs.
  • Digital radiographs analyzed using ImageJ software for normalized bone density values.
  • Marginal Bone Level (MBL) changes were assessed alongside bone density calculations.
  • Statistical analyses included Shapiro-Wilk test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn’s post hoc test.
  • 88 implants in 64 patients were evaluated over a 12-month follow-up period.
  • Significant changes in bone density were observed mainly from 3 to 12 months in various areas of interest.
  • Normalized bone density decreased by approximately 8% at 3 months but significantly increased by 12 months.
  • MBL values remained below physiological thresholds during follow-up without significant correlation to bone density changes.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Osseointegration is essential for the long-term success of dental implants, and radiographic assessment may support the evaluation of peri-implant bone healing. This retrospective study evaluated peri-implant radiographic bone density (PIBD) as a potential indicator of osseointegration in patients who underwent successful implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. Methods: Patients with at least one endosseous dental implant and a minimum of two standardized periapical radiographs—one at placement (T0) and one during follow-up—were included. Digital radiographs were obtained using the paralleling technique and analyzed with ImageJ®. Normalized bone density values were calculated for predefined areas of interest (AOIs). Marginal Bone Level (MBL) changes were also assessed. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro–Wilk test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Dunn’s post hoc test with Bonferroni correction. Results: 88 implants in 64 patients were analyzed (198 radiographs; 1299 AOIs measurements). Normalized bone density showed significant temporal changes in several AOIs, mainly from 3 to 12 months, across coronal/middle/apical regions. PIBD decreased by approximately 8% between T0 and 3 months, followed by a significant increase at one year. MBL values were minimal and well below physiologic thresholds throughout follow-up. No significant correlation was found between MBL and normalized bone density. Conclusions: PIBD assessment may be a reliable, non-invasive tool for monitoring osseointegration during follow-up and supporting clinical decision-making in postoperative controls. The temporal pattern observed confirms three radiographic healing phases after implant placement: an initial decrease in PIBD during early remodeling, a subsequent increase reflecting osseointegration, and a final stabilization phase corresponding to tertiary implant stability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lupi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fc8de8e28729cf648f5https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14040541
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper