PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20261 citationsOpen Access

Quality Assessment of Digital 3D Models of Museum Artefacts from the Mobile LiDAR iPhone and Structured Light Scanners

View Full Paper
JMJerzy MontusiewiczMMMarek MiłoszWSWojciech Sarnowski

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the quality of digital 3D models created from museum artefacts using different scanning technologies.
  • Created digital 3D models of artefacts using 3D structured-light scanning and mobile LiDAR.
  • Compared models based on accuracy, quality, and speed of generation.
  • Analyzed models from artefacts collected in 2017 and 2025.
  • 3D models generated using mobile LiDAR are incomplete and less versatile.
  • Professional 3D scanners yield better accuracy and quality in terms of mesh density and texture.
  • Mobile LiDAR models are suitable for marketing and digital tourism but not for archival purposes.

Abstract

Creating a digital 3D model of museum artefacts has been a common practice for many years. Such models can be used for archiving, research, and marketing purposes, as well as to counteract various types of exclusion. A digital copy created using professional 3D scanners using 3D structured-light scanning (3D SLS) or terrestrial laser scanning technology requires expensive equipment, specialised software for postprocessing, and a trained team. The introduction of mobile phones with Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors and the development of appropriate open-access software have enabled the use of phones to generate digital 3D models. This study compares the quality of 3D models created with 3D SLS and mobile LiDAR technologies using three identical small museum artefacts from the Silk Road area of the Samarkand State University museum in Uzbekistan. They were digitised in 2017 and 2025. The results indicate that digital 3D models generated with an iPhone 16 PRO MAX device using Scaniverse LiDAR software are incomplete and thus less versatile. Therefore, they cannot serve as archival models. Their accuracy and quality (mesh density, size, and texture quality), as well as the speed of generating 3D models, make them ideal for marketing purposes and digital tourism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montusiewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fd9de8e28729cf64a7ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/app16042100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper