PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Multiple Sclerosis Journal0 citations

Comparison of individuals with radiologically isolated syndrome, early multiple sclerosis patients, and healthy controls using a digital neurological examination

View Full Paper
CMCohen MikaëlLMLydiane MondotXAXavier Ayrignac

Key Points

  • To compare neurological functions between individuals with radiologically isolated syndrome, early multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls using a digital assessment tool.
  • Conducted a multicentric, cross-sectional study
  • Assessed subjects using the Neuraccure iPad application
  • Evaluated hand coordination, low-contrast vision, reaction time, and eye movements
  • Healthy controls outperformed both RIS and MS patients across all digital measures
  • No significant difference between RIS and MS patients except in coordination testing
  • Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed 83.2% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity for detecting RIS and MS from healthy controls

Abstract

Background: The revised McDonald criteria shifted toward the recognition of the radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) as the first phase of the multiple sclerosis (MS) spectrum. Objectives: To characterize differences between RIS individuals, early MS patients, and healthy controls (HCs) using a high-precision clinical assessment tool based on digital technology. Methods: We performed a multicentric, cross-sectional study involving RIS, early MS patients, and HC. Subjects were assessed using Neuraccure, an iPad application capable of detecting subtle abnormalities in four neurological functions: hand coordination, low-contrast vision, reaction time, and eye movements. Results: In total, 565 individuals were included (MS: 255, RIS: 146, HC: 164). HC performed better than RIS and MS across all digital measures ( p < 0.0001 to 0.03). There was no statistical difference between RIS and MS patients, except for the coordination test, which was slightly worse in MS patients ( p = 0.03). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the presence of at least two impaired functions could detect RIS and MS from HC with 83.2% sensitivity and 84.3% specificity. A higher number of impaired functions were associated with lower brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumes. Conclusion: High-precision neurological evaluation can distinguish HC from RIS and MS at an individual scale with a good performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mikaël et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d3fd9de8e28729cf64b0dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/13524585261418921
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Presymptomatic multiple sclerosis: Insights from the Radiologically Isolated Syndrome2025
  2. 2Applying the 2024-revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis using conventional diagnostic tools: a single-centre prospective cohort study in Germany2026
  3. 3Myelin damage in radiologically isolated syndrome is associated with decreased processing speed2026
  4. 4Health-Related Quality of Life in Radiologically Isolated Syndrome Resembles Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Replication of the 2023 radiologically isolated syndrome criteria in a multi-center cohort2025