PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Circular Bioeconomy Model for Oaxaca: Integrating Entomophagy and Zootechnical Validation in Small-Scale Tilapia Farming

View Full Paper
TATamara Aquino-AguilarYOYolanda Donají Ortiz-HernándezMAMarco Aurelio Acevedo-Ortiz

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a sustainable model for tilapia farming in Oaxaca by integrating entomophagy and reducing feed costs.
  • Conducted sociocultural diagnosis to assess acceptance of insects (n = 140).
  • Performed a 280-day feeding trial replacing commercial feed with insect meals in tilapia diets.
  • Analyzed feed conversion ratio and protein content in tilapia fillets.
  • Conducted microbiological analysis of the final product.
  • Achieved feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 1.61–1.62, comparable to commercial feeds.
  • Significantly enhanced fillet protein content.
  • Confirmed absence of pathogens in the final product, ensuring safety.

Abstract

Global population growth necessitates sustainable food systems, positioning Circular Bioeconomy as a key transition framework. In Oaxaca, Mexico, semi-intensive tilapia aquaculture faces economic viability issues due to a critical reliance on expensive external commercial feeds. This study proposes a “Backyard Integrated System” specifically designed for rural contexts with limited capitalization, connecting traditional entomophagy with aquaculture to reduce operational costs and close nutrient cycles. Using a mixed-method approach, we first conducted a sociocultural diagnosis (n = 140), revealing a 97.14% acceptance of insect consumption. Subsequently, to validate technical viability, a long-term (280-day) feeding trial was conducted using standardized insect meals (Tenebrio molitor and Acheta domesticus) as total substitutes (100%) for commercial feed in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets. Results showed a Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) of 1.61–1.62, comparable to the commercial control (p > 0.05), while significantly enhancing fillet protein content. Crucially, microbiological analysis confirmed the absence of pathogens in the final product, empirically validating the safety of the waste-to-feed cycle. Consequently, this strategy ensures food sovereignty, decouples producers from volatile external markets, and offers a scalable solution for community resilience without compromising food safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aquino-Aguilar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d401ade8e28729cf6520ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/insects17020225
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1One Health approach to tilapia welfare: public policies for sustainable aquaculture in Papaloapan indigenous communities, Oaxaca, Mexico2026
  2. 2Socially Acceptable Feed Formulations May Impact the Voluntary Feed Intake and Growth, but Not Robustness of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Impact of Feeding Strategies on Trophic Dynamics, Growth Performance and Sustainability of Nile Tilapia in Semi‐Intensive Aquaculture Systems2026
  4. 4Impact of Fish Feed Formulated with Microalgae Biomass in Experimental Tanks with (Oreochromis Niloticus) Tilapia Culture2024
  5. 5CARBON AND RESOURCE FOOTPRINTS OF LAYING HEN FARMS IN SAN JERÓNIMO, ANTIOQUIA: AN ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT2026