PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026International Journal of Environmental Health Research0 citations

Groundwater contamination sources and health risk assessment in the Kula–Selendi region, western Anatolia

View Full Paper
AKAnıl KüçüksümbülGTGültekin Tarcan

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify sources of groundwater contamination and evaluate associated health risks in the Kula-Selendi region.
  • Analyzed 30 water samples (27 groundwater and 3 surface water) for major ions and trace metal(loid)s.
  • Employed principal component analysis (PCA) to identify dominant hydrogeochemical processes.
  • Conducted health risk assessment (HRA) focusing on toxicological impacts of contaminants.
  • Identified arsenic enrichment in sedimentary aquifers (up to 3050 µg L<sup>-1</sup>), decoupled from the Kula Geothermal System.
  • Elevated nitrate levels (up to 454.7 mg L<sup>-1</sup>) linked to agricultural activities.
  • High carcinogenic risk from arsenic and significant non-carcinogenic risk from lithium, nitrate, and boron.

Abstract

Groundwater contamination in western Türkiye's basins remains poorly understood because geogenic and anthropogenic influences overlap. This study assesses sources and human health risks associated with groundwater contamination in the Kula-Selendi region (Manisa), where geothermal, cold mineral-rich, and cold fresh groundwater types coexist. Thirty water samples (27 groundwater and 3 surface water) were analyzed for major ions, trace metal(loid)s (TMs), and physicochemical parameters. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified four dominant hydrogeochemical processes: silicate weathering, carbonate dissolution, anthropogenic contamination, and arsenic mobilization. Geothermal waters in the Vezirler mélange contained low arsenic (≤2 µg L-1), whereas cold groundwater in sedimentary aquifers reached 3050 µg L-1, indicating that arsenic enrichment is decoupled from the Kula Geothermal System. Elevated nitrate (up to 454.7 mg L-1) in shallow aquifers reflects inputs from agricultural and livestock activities. Health risk assessment (HRA) showed that arsenic in sedimentary aquifers posed high carcinogenic risk and dominated non-carcinogenic risk via drinking water, followed by lithium, nitrate, and boron. Dermal exposure generally posed low risk, although boron and lithium made relatively greater contributions. The combined PCA-HRA approach links hydrogeochemical processes to human health risks and supports targeted monitoring of naturally enriched TMs (As, B, Li) and mitigation of nitrate pollution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Küçüksümbül et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e90eff5123be5ed04e275https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2026.2634186
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geochemical and Isotopic Characteristics of the Emir Geothermal Waters in Kula Area, Western Anatolia2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Fertilizers and nitrate pollution of surface and ground water: an increasingly pervasive global problem2021 · 989 citations
  3. 3Neotectonics of Turkey – a synthesis2001 · 738 citations
  4. 4Groundwater quality: Global threats, opportunities and realising the potential of groundwater2021 · 165 citations
  5. 5Pesticides, Gene Polymorphisms, and Bladder Cancer Among Egyptian Agricultural Workers2013 · 65 citations