PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026RMD Open0 citationsOpen Access

Orbital MRI for diagnosing giant cell arteritis in cases of anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy

View Full Paper
GBG. BrenacABAngélique BernardACAdrien Chavent

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how well orbital MRI can differentiate between arteritic and non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy in patients with giant cell arteritis.
  • Prospective single-centre study
  • Enrolled patients over 50 years with recent-onset AION
  • Final diagnosis of GCA confirmed after assessments and 6 months follow-up
  • Orbital MRIs evaluated by two blinded radiologists
  • Nine patients had A-AION and nine had NA-AION
  • MRI showed significant differences in contrast enhancement between groups
  • Best feature for diagnosis was retrobulbar fat enhancement with 100% sensitivity
  • Bilateral orbital enhancement noted in more than half of unaffected contralateral eyes of A-AION patients

Abstract

Objectives Acute anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (AION) is a feared ischaemic complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, distinguishing arteritic AION (A-AION) from its non-arteritic counterpart (NA-AION), which accounts for approximately 90% of cases, can be challenging. Rapid initiation of glucocorticoids is essential to prevent irreversible vision loss in GCA but is unnecessary in NA-AION. This study evaluated the use of orbital MRI in differentiating A-AION from NA-AION. Methods In this prospective single-centre study, patients >50 years who had recent-onset AION were enrolled between June 2021 and October 2024. The final diagnosis of GCA was confirmed after comprehensive assessments and ≥6 months follow-up. Orbital MRIs were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists blinded to the clinical diagnosis. Results Of the 18 patients analysed, nine had A-AION (two with bilateral involvement), while nine had NA-AION. MRI demonstrated differences between the groups, notably in contrast enhancement of the ophthalmic artery (72.7% vs 22.2%; p=0.07), perineural fat (90.9% vs 22.2%; p=0.005) and retrobulbar fat (100% vs 11.1%; p<0.001). The most discriminative MRI feature was retrobulbar fat enhancement, achieving 100% (95% CI 72 to 100) sensitivity and 89% (95% CI 52 to 100) specificity. Bilateral orbital enhancement was identified in more than half of the unaffected contralateral eyes in A-AION patients. Conclusion These results suggest that orbital MRI may help clinicians rapidly differentiate between A-AION and NA-AION to provide the most appropriate treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brenac et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9106f5123be5ed04e4bchttps://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006370
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper