PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Frontline Gastroenterology0 citations

Jejunal feeding in patients with disorders of gut–brain interaction and gastrointestinal dysmotility: perceptions among health professionals

View Full Paper
ASAyodele SasegbonRCRebecca Dodd ChandlerHOHazel Orme

Key Points

  • To understand health professionals’ attitudes towards jejunal feeding in patients with disorders of gut–brain interaction and gastrointestinal dysmotility.
  • Distributed a 21-item digital questionnaire to health professionals in Britain.
  • Analyzed responses statistically to assess perceptions regarding jejunal feeding.
  • Gathered data on demographics, comfort levels, and experiences with patient management.
  • 76 health professionals completed the questionnaire, primarily dietitians and physicians.
  • 69% lacked access to a neurogastroenterologist for patient care.
  • Participants perceived that gastrointestinal dysmotility often requires jejunal feeding more than gut-brain interaction disorders.
  • A higher percentage of respondents felt comfortable managing GID compared to DGBI cases.
  • 82% indicated that patients could not tolerate jejunal infusion rates over 50mls per hour.

Abstract

Objective Patients with disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) and gastrointestinal dysmotility (GID) suffering from malnutrition may require jejunal feeding. Here, we surveyed the attitudes of health professionals who care for patients with DGBI and GID towards jejunal feeding. Method A 21-item digital questionnaire was designed and electronically distributed to members of the British Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Data were then analysed arithmetically and statistically. Results 76 individuals from various professional groups involved in the nutritional care of patients with DGBI and GID completed the questionnaire, with the majority being dietitians (57%) and physicians (28%). 69% of participants worked in settings where they had no access to a neurogastroenterologist. Respondents indicated that in their experience, GID conditions were more likely to require jejunal feeding (22%–30%) compared with DGBI conditions (4%–9%). Unexpectedly, despite DGBI being milder conditions than GID, more respondents were comfortable managing patients with GID than those with DGBI (61% vs 43%). Additionally, patients with GID were felt by respondents to tolerate jejunal feeding better (22%) than those with DGBI (9%). Most respondents stated that their patients with DGBI and GID (82%) were unable to tolerate jejunal infusion rates of more than 50mls per hour. All respondents (100%) stated that ≥25% of their patients took opioids. Conclusions This study expands our understanding of health professionals’ experiences of jejunal feeding in DGBI and GID and has highlighted several important issues, including poor access to neurogastroenterologists, high rates of opioid use and low tolerated infusion rates of jejunal feeding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sasegbon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e911bf5123be5ed04e5f9https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2025-103403
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper