PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026EMBO Molecular Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Sulfated glycosaminoglycans inhibit LCMV entry and modulate antiviral immunity and pathology

MGMichal GorzkiewiczSNSoha NoseirMVMandar Vengurlekar

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate the effects of sulfated glycosaminoglycans on LCMV entry and the immune response.
  • Tested the effects of sulfated GAGs on viral binding and entry in cell lines and dendritic cells.
  • Analyzed the impact of dextran sulfate on LCMV infection in a model organism.
  • Evaluated immune responses following treatment at different infection stages.
  • Sulfated GAGs significantly reduced LCMV entry into host cells.
  • Early exposure to dextran sulfate led to decreased immune activation and prolonged viral infection.
  • Administering dextran sulfate during acute infection improved T-cell responses and reduced liver damage.

Abstract

Abstract Viral infections remain a major challenge due to the limited availability and efficacy of current treatments. Existing antivirals primarily target viral replication but are often virus-specific and can lead to drug resistance. Sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) have emerged as promising broad-spectrum agents that block viral binding and entry into host cells. Here, we show that highly sulfated GAGs restrict the infectivity of both pathogenic and non-pathogenic Arenaviruses. Using the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) model, we demonstrate that GAG exposure reduces viral entry and infection in cell lines and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, impairing their ability to activate antiviral T cells. In vivo, early exposure of LCMV to dextran sulfate suppressed immune activation, leading to diminished T-cell responses, prolonged infection, and increased immunopathology. By contrast, administering dextran sulfate during the acute infection phase decreased viral load, improved effector T-cell function, and reduced liver pathology. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of sulfated GAGs against Arenavirus infections and the importance of treatment timing for clinical efficacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gorzkiewicz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e911bf5123be5ed04e622https://doi.org/10.1038/s44321-026-00387-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Langevin dynamics of peptides: The frictional dependence of isomerization rates of N ‐acetylalanyl‐ N ′‐methylamide1992 · 1,227 citations
  2. 2High-Affinity–Mediated Viral Entry Triggers Innate Affinity Escape Resulting in Type I IFN Resistance and Impaired T Cell Immunity2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3Infectious disease in an era of global change2021 · 2,076 citations
  4. 4Specificity of glycosaminoglycan–protein interactions2018 · 195 citations
  5. 5Enforced viral replication activates adaptive immunity and is essential for the control of a cytopathic virus2011 · 232 citations