PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Journal of Neurophysiology0 citations

Four-second trains of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation increase online corticospinal excitability and pupil size in humans

View Full Paper
RDRonan DenyerSSShiyong SuMPMantosh Patnaik

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on corticospinal excitability and pupil size during active stimulation.
  • Delivered repeated 4-second trains of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and sham stimulation.
  • Measured motor evoked potentials during and shortly after stimulation.
  • Recorded pupil size throughout the stimulation trains.
  • Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation significantly increased corticospinal excitability compared to sham stimulation during active stimulation.
  • The increase in corticospinal excitability was greater during the latter half of the stimulation.
  • Pupil size also increased significantly with transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, peaking earlier than the effects on corticospinal excitability.

Abstract

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has emerged as a method for interrogating the role of the locus coeruleus (LC) norepinephrine system in human behavior. Tuning of excitability in the corticospinal tract is central to many cognitive and motor processes, but little is known about how the LC contributes to this tuning. In particular, no existing studies have examined the effect of tVNS on corticospinal excitability “online” during active stimulation, where the largest effects on pupil size are observed. To address this question, we delivered repeated 4-second trains of tVNS and sham stimulation and elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during stimulation trains (online) and shortly after train offset (offline). Pupil size was concurrently recorded throughout each train. We discovered that tVNS significantly increases corticospinal excitability compared to sham stimulation, but only when measured online and not offline. The excitatory effects on corticospinal excitability were greater in the latter half of tVNS trains. Pupil size was also significantly increased by tVNS compared to sham; however, the effect on pupil size peaked earlier during the tVNS trains compared to corticospinal excitability. In line with these distinct temporal profiles, changes in corticospinal excitability and pupil size were not significantly correlated, likely reflecting differences in the anatomical circuits underpinning each effect. This work demonstrates for the first time that tVNS increases corticospinal excitability at rest, but the effect only emerges when corticospinal excitability is measured online during active tVNS. Implications for basic and clinical neuroscientific research are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Denyer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e911bf5123be5ed04e6adhttps://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00008.2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper